Revision History: HB1279 Affordable housing religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties
2026-03-13 21:27:40
Edited by: 74.110.224.58
Edited by: 74.110.224.58
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that... It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === Mr. Speaker, HB1279 lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only go into effect if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a === House Floor (Senate Substitute) === Mr. Speaker, the Senate substitute to HB1279 makes several changes to the bill. This substitute modifies infrastructure requirements by allowing projects where water and sewer lines are located within 500 feet of the property line, clarifies that projects must comply with state, federal, and local environmental and archaeological protections, and standardizes setbacks at 10 feet or half the building height where applicable. It also adds exclusions for properties within military Air Installation Compatible Use Zones and clarifies that the bill does not alter existing legal authority to protect historic districts or archaeological resources. I move that the House reject the Senate substitute and request a conference committee so that we may resolve the differences between this bill and its Senate cognate. - <hr> + ==== House Conference Statement === - == Support and Opposition == + The HB1279, Faith in Housing, conference report reflects the work of many stakeholders who came together to address concerns raised by localities and residents while keeping the bill’s core mission intact. - === Support === + The report makes three changes. - • Faith-based housing advocates + - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + First, it adds a <b>delayed enactment of January 1, 2027</b>, giving localities time to prepare. - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + - + Second, it establishes a <b>four-year sunset</b> so the General Assembly can evaluate how the policy works. - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + - + Third, it <b>excludes projects already moving through the rezoning process</b>, ensuring current efforts are not disrupted. - === Opposition === + - • (To be updated) + These changes show that we listened and worked toward compromise. - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + - + While some may say not in my backyard, today we can say yes in God’s backyard.** - === No Recommendation === + - • (To be updated) + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + == Support and Opposition == - == Fiscal Impact == + - + === Support === - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + • Faith-based housing advocates - + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - <hr> + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - == Possible Questions == + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - === TL;DR === + === No Recommendation === - + • (To be updated) - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + <hr> - <br> + == Fiscal Impact == - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + - + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - <br> + - + <hr> - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + == Possible Questions == - <br> + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + === TL;DR === - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + - + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + <br> - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + - + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <br> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + - + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <br> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + - + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <br> + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + - + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + - + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <br> + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + - + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + - + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <br> + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + - + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <hr> + - + <br> - == Additional Information == + - + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + - + <hr> - <br> + - + == Additional Information == - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + - • 60% affordability + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - • 50-year minimum + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - <br> + - + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + <br> - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - <br> + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + - • Administrative approval + <br> - • Nondiscrimination requirements + - • Taxation provisions + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + • 60% affordability - + • 50-year minimum - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + <br> - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + - • Reduces displacement + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + <br> - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + • Administrative approval - + • Nondiscrimination requirements - <br> + • Taxation provisions - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + - • Reduces litigation risk + <br> - • Encourages nonprofit participation + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - [[Category:2026 Session]] + • Reduces displacement + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + + <br> + + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + + <br> + + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Reduces litigation risk + • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-03-13 21:25:34
Edited by: 74.110.224.58
Edited by: 74.110.224.58
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that... It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === Mr. Speaker, HB1279 lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only go into effect if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a === House Floor (Senate Substitute) === Mr. Speaker, the Senate substitute to HB1279 makes several changes to the bill. This substitute modifies infrastructure requirements by allowing projects where water and sewer lines are located within 500 feet of the property line, clarifies that projects must comply with state, federal, and local environmental and archaeological protections, and standardizes setbacks at 10 feet or half the building height where applicable. It also adds exclusions for properties within military Air Installation Compatible Use Zones and clarifies that the bill does not alter existing legal authority to protect historic districts or archaeological resources. - I move that the House reject the Senate substitute and request a conference committee so that we may resolve the differences between this bill and its companion, SB388. + I move that the House reject the Senate substitute and request a conference committee so that we may resolve the differences between this bill and its Senate cognate. <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-03-06 15:41:12
Edited by: 174.221.242.8
Edited by: 174.221.242.8
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that... It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === Mr. Speaker, HB1279 lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only go into effect if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a === House Floor (Senate Substitute) === Mr. Speaker, the Senate substitute to HB1279 makes several changes to the bill. This substitute modifies infrastructure requirements by allowing projects where water and sewer lines are located within 500 feet of the property line, clarifies that projects must comply with state, federal, and local environmental and archaeological protections, and standardizes setbacks at 10 feet or half the building height where applicable. It also adds exclusions for properties within military Air Installation Compatible Use Zones and clarifies that the bill does not alter existing legal authority to protect historic districts or archaeological resources. - I move that the House reject the Senate substitute and request a conference committee so the two chambers may resolve the differences between this bill and its companion, SB388. + I move that the House reject the Senate substitute and request a conference committee so that we may resolve the differences between this bill and its companion, SB388. <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-03-06 15:40:31
Edited by: 174.221.242.8
Edited by: 174.221.242.8
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that... It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === Mr. Speaker, HB1279 lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only go into effect if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a === House Floor (Senate Substitute) === - Mr. Speaker, the Senate has returned HB1279 with a substitute. + Mr. Speaker, the Senate substitute to HB1279 makes several changes to the bill. - I move that the House reject the Senate substitute and request a conference committee so the two chambers may resolve the differences between this bill and its companion, SB388. + This substitute modifies infrastructure requirements by allowing projects where water and sewer lines are located within 500 feet of the property line, clarifies that projects must comply with state, federal, and local environmental and archaeological protections, and standardizes setbacks at 10 feet or half the building height where applicable. It also adds exclusions for properties within military Air Installation Compatible Use Zones and clarifies that the bill does not alter existing legal authority to protect historic districts or archaeological resources. - <hr> + I move that the House reject the Senate substitute and request a conference committee so the two chambers may resolve the differences between this bill and its companion, SB388. - == Support and Opposition == + <hr> - === Support === + == Support and Opposition == - • Faith-based housing advocates + - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + === Support === - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + • Faith-based housing advocates - + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - === Opposition === + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - • (To be updated) + - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - === No Recommendation === + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - • (To be updated) + - + === No Recommendation === - <hr> + • (To be updated) - == Fiscal Impact == + <hr> - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + == Fiscal Impact == - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - <hr> + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - == Possible Questions == + <hr> - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + == Possible Questions == - === TL;DR === + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + === TL;DR === - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + - + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + <br> - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + - + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + <br> - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + - + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + <br> - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + - + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + <br> - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + - + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <br> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <br> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <br> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <br> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <br> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <br> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <br> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <br> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <hr> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - == Additional Information == + <hr> - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + == Additional Information == - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - <br> + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + <br> - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + <br> - • 60% affordability + - • 50-year minimum + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + • 60% affordability - + • 50-year minimum - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + <br> - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + <br> - • Administrative approval + - • Nondiscrimination requirements + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - • Taxation provisions + • Administrative approval - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + • Nondiscrimination requirements - + • Taxation provisions - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + <br> - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + - • Reduces displacement + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - + • Reduces displacement - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + <br> - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + <br> - • Reduces litigation risk + - • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + • Reduces litigation risk - + • Encourages nonprofit participation - [[Category:2026 Session]] + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-03-06 15:31:53
Edited by: 174.221.242.8
Edited by: 174.221.242.8
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that... It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === Mr. Speaker, HB1279 lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only go into effect if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a - <hr> + === House Floor (Senate Substitute) === - == Support and Opposition == + Mr. Speaker, the Senate has returned HB1279 with a substitute. - === Support === + I move that the House reject the Senate substitute and request a conference committee so the two chambers may resolve the differences between this bill and its companion, SB388. - • Faith-based housing advocates + - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + <hr> - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + - + == Support and Opposition == - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + - + === Support === - === Opposition === + • Faith-based housing advocates - • (To be updated) + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - === No Recommendation === + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - • (To be updated) + - + === Opposition === - <hr> + • (To be updated) - + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - == Fiscal Impact == + - + === No Recommendation === - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + • (To be updated) - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + <hr> - <hr> + == Fiscal Impact == - == Possible Questions == + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - === TL;DR === + <hr> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + == Possible Questions == - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + - + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - <br> + - + === TL;DR === - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <br> + - + <br> - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + - + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <hr> + <br> - == Additional Information == + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + <hr> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + - + == Additional Information == - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + - + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - <br> + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - • 60% affordability + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - • 50-year minimum + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + • 60% affordability - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + • 50-year minimum - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - • Administrative approval + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - • Nondiscrimination requirements + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - • Taxation provisions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + <br> - <br> + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - + • Administrative approval - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + • Nondiscrimination requirements - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + • Taxation provisions - • Reduces displacement + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + • Reduces displacement - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - • Reduces litigation risk + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + - + <br> - [[Category:2026 Session]] + + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Reduces litigation risk + • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-03-06 15:05:09
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that... It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === - Mr. Speaker, HB1279 helps families who need a safe place to live. Too many people cannot find affordable housing. Some sleep in cars. Some sleep on couches. Some have nowhere to go. As Scripture says, “the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.” + Mr. Speaker, HB1279 lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. - This bill lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. + It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only go into effect if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. - It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only go into effect if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. + I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. - I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - + n/a - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + - n/a + === Senate Committee Statement === - + n/a - === Senate Committee Statement === + - n/a + <hr> - <hr> + == Support and Opposition == - == Support and Opposition == + === Support === - + • Faith-based housing advocates - === Support === + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - • Faith-based housing advocates + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - === Opposition === + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - • (To be updated) + - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + === No Recommendation === - + • (To be updated) - === No Recommendation === + - • (To be updated) + <hr> - <hr> + == Fiscal Impact == - == Fiscal Impact == + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + <hr> - <hr> + == Possible Questions == - == Possible Questions == + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + === TL;DR === - === TL;DR === + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + <br> - <br> + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + <br> - <br> + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + <br> - <br> + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + <br> - <br> + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + <br> - <br> + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + <hr> - <hr> + == Additional Information == - == Additional Information == + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <br> - <br> + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + <br> - <br> + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - + • 60% affordability - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + • 50-year minimum - • 60% affordability + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - • 50-year minimum + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + <br> - <br> + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + <br> - <br> + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - + • Administrative approval - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + • Nondiscrimination requirements - • Administrative approval + • Taxation provisions - • Nondiscrimination requirements + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - • Taxation provisions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + <br> - <br> + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + • Reduces displacement - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - • Reduces displacement + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + <br> - <br> + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + <br> - <br> + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - + • Reduces litigation risk - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Encourages nonprofit participation - • Reduces litigation risk + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - • Encourages nonprofit participation + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + [[Category:2026 Session]] - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-02-04 03:18:03
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that... It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === Mr. Speaker, HB1279 helps families who need a safe place to live. Too many people cannot find affordable housing. Some sleep in cars. Some sleep on couches. Some have nowhere to go. As Scripture says, “the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.” This bill lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. - It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only continue if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. + It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only go into effect if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-02-04 02:59:01
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that... It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === - n/a + - + Mr. Speaker, HB1279 helps families who need a safe place to live. Too many people cannot find affordable housing. Some sleep in cars. Some sleep on couches. Some have nowhere to go. As Scripture says, “the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.” - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + - n/a + This bill lets faith groups use their land to build homes. It removes barriers. It gives communities more tools to help their neighbors. - === Senate Committee Statement === + It also includes a reenactment clause. The law will only continue if the 2027 General Assembly approves it again. - n/a + - + I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it to its third reading. - <hr> + - + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - == Support and Opposition == + n/a - === Support === + === Senate Committee Statement === - • Faith-based housing advocates + n/a - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + <hr> - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + == Support and Opposition == - === Opposition === + === Support === - • (To be updated) + • Faith-based housing advocates - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - === No Recommendation === + - • (To be updated) + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - <hr> + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - == Fiscal Impact == + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + === No Recommendation === - + • (To be updated) - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + == Fiscal Impact == - == Possible Questions == + - + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + - + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - === TL;DR === + - + <hr> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + == Possible Questions == - <br> + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + === TL;DR === - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + - + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + <br> - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + - + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + <br> - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + - + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + <br> - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + - + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - <br> + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <br> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + - + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <br> + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + - + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + - + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <br> + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + - + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + - + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <br> + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + - + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + - + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <br> + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + - + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <hr> + - + <br> - == Additional Information == + - + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + <hr> - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + == Additional Information == - <br> + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - • 60% affordability + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - • 50-year minimum + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + • 60% affordability - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + • 50-year minimum - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - • Administrative approval + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - • Nondiscrimination requirements + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - • Taxation provisions + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + • Administrative approval - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + • Nondiscrimination requirements - • Reduces displacement + • Taxation provisions - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + • Reduces displacement - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - • Reduces litigation risk + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - • Encourages nonprofit participation + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + <br> + + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Reduces litigation risk + • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-02-04 02:57:33
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. - We have mastered the art of excuses. + <br> - We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” + And all the while, the question remains unanswered: - <br> + - And all the while, the question remains unanswered: + Where are the houses? - + Where are the homes? - Where are the houses? + Where is the shelter for God’s people? - Where are the homes? + - Where is the shelter for God’s people? + Luke 9:58... - + <blockquote> - Luke 9:58... + Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." - <blockquote> + </blockquote> - Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." + - </blockquote> + <br> - <br> + So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? - So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? + Matthew 25:35... - + <blockquote> - Matthew 25:35... + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - <blockquote> + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + </blockquote> - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + - </blockquote> + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + He said: You welcomed me. - He said: You welcomed me. + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. + <br> - <br> + This bill says something very simple: - + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - This bill says something very simple: + - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + This bill says: - + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - This bill says: + - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + <br> - <br> + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. + It was designed. - It was designed. + It was planned. - It was planned. + It was written into law. - It was written into law. + They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. - They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. + Communities boxed out. - + Neighborhoods erased. - Communities boxed out. + People told: “You do not belong here.” - Neighborhoods erased. + - People told: “You do not belong here.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - And then we called it “order.” + We called it “property values.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “property values.” + <br> - <br> + But the Bible calls it something else. - But the Bible calls it something else. + James 5:4... - + <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> - James 5:4... + - <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> + Those cries are still ringing. - Those cries are still ringing. + They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. - + They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. - They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. + They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. - They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. + <br> - They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - <br> + - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + But when it is time to build— - But when it is time to build— + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - + Too dense. - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + Too different. - Too dense. + Too difficult. - Too different. + <br> - Too difficult. + - <br> + HB 1279 rejects that... - HB 1279 rejects that... + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. - It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. + It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. - It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. + I ask you to report this bill. - I ask you to report this bill. + <hr> - <hr> + === House Committee Statement === - + n/a - === House Committee Statement === + - n/a + === Floor Statement === - + n/a - === Floor Statement === + - n/a + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - + n/a - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + - n/a + === Senate Committee Statement === - + n/a - === Senate Committee Statement === + - n/a + <hr> - <hr> + == Support and Opposition == - == Support and Opposition == + === Support === - + • Faith-based housing advocates - === Support === + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - • Faith-based housing advocates + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - === Opposition === + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - • (To be updated) + - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + === No Recommendation === - + • (To be updated) - === No Recommendation === + - • (To be updated) + <hr> - <hr> + == Fiscal Impact == - == Fiscal Impact == + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + <hr> - <hr> + == Possible Questions == - == Possible Questions == + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + === TL;DR === - === TL;DR === + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + <br> - <br> + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + <br> - <br> + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + <br> - <br> + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + <br> - <br> + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + <br> - <br> + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + <hr> - <hr> + == Additional Information == - == Additional Information == + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <br> - <br> + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + <br> - <br> + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - + • 60% affordability - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + • 50-year minimum - • 60% affordability + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - • 50-year minimum + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + <br> - <br> + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + <br> - <br> + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - + • Administrative approval - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + • Nondiscrimination requirements - • Administrative approval + • Taxation provisions - • Nondiscrimination requirements + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - • Taxation provisions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + <br> - <br> + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + • Reduces displacement - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - • Reduces displacement + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + <br> - <br> + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + <br> - <br> + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - + • Reduces litigation risk - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Encourages nonprofit participation - • Reduces litigation risk + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - • Encourages nonprofit participation + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + [[Category:2026 Session]] - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:35:16
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuses. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - + Too dense. - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + Too different. - Too dense. + Too difficult. - Too different. + <br> - Too difficult. + - <br> + HB 1279 rejects that... - HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. - It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. + It says: it's time to let those who are willing provide housing to the Commonwealth. - <br> + I ask you to report this bill. - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + <hr> - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + === House Committee Statement === - + n/a - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + - + === Floor Statement === - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + n/a - <br> + - HB 1279 is about what we know... + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - + n/a - It's about our faith in delivering housing to the Commonwealth. + - + === Senate Committee Statement === - I ask you to report this bill. + n/a <hr> - === House Committee Statement === + == Support and Opposition == - n/a + - + === Support === - === Floor Statement === + • Faith-based housing advocates - n/a + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + - n/a + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - === Senate Committee Statement === + === Opposition === - n/a + • (To be updated) - + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - <hr> + - + === No Recommendation === - == Support and Opposition == + • (To be updated) - === Support === + <hr> - • Faith-based housing advocates + - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + == Fiscal Impact == - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + - + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + - + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - === Opposition === + - • (To be updated) + <hr> - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + - + == Possible Questions == - === No Recommendation === + - • (To be updated) + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - <hr> + === TL;DR === - == Fiscal Impact == + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + - + <br> - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + - + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - <hr> + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - == Possible Questions == + <br> - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - === TL;DR === + - + <br> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <br> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <hr> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + == Additional Information == - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - <br> + - + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + - + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + - + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - <hr> + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - == Additional Information == + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + <br> - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + • 60% affordability - + • 50-year minimum - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - • 60% affordability + • Administrative approval - • 50-year minimum + • Nondiscrimination requirements - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + • Taxation provisions - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + • Reduces displacement - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + - • Administrative approval + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - • Nondiscrimination requirements + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - • Taxation provisions + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + • Reduces litigation risk - • Reduces displacement + • Encourages nonprofit participation - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - <br> + [[Category:2026 Session]] - - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - - <br> - - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - • Reduces litigation risk - • Encourages nonprofit participation - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:32:06
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. - We have mastered the art of excuse. + We have mastered the art of excuses. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. <br> - And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. - Because it asks a direct question: + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - If you say you care about housing— + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about the Son of Man— + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. - + <br> - So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + HB 1279 is about what we know... - Where are the <b>houses</b>? + It's about our faith in delivering housing to the Commonwealth. - Where are the <b>homes</b>? + I ask you to report this bill. - Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? + <hr> - <br> + - The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + === House Committee Statement === - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + n/a - Not tomorrow. + === Floor Statement === - + n/a - Now. + - + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - <br> + n/a - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + === Senate Committee Statement === - + n/a - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + - + <hr> - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + - + == Support and Opposition == - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + - <br> + === Support === - HB 1279 is about what we know... + • Faith-based housing advocates - + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - It's about our faith in delivering housing to the Commonwealth. + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - I ask you to report this bill. + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - <hr> + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - === House Committee Statement === + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - n/a + - + === No Recommendation === - === Floor Statement === + • (To be updated) - n/a + - + <hr> - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + - n/a + == Fiscal Impact == - === Senate Committee Statement === + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - n/a + - + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - <hr> + - + <hr> - == Support and Opposition == + - + == Possible Questions == - === Support === + - • Faith-based housing advocates + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + === TL;DR === - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - === Opposition === + - • (To be updated) + <br> - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + - + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - === No Recommendation === + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - • (To be updated) + - + <br> - <hr> + - + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - == Fiscal Impact == + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + <br> - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <hr> + - + <br> - == Possible Questions == + - + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - === TL;DR === + <br> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - <br> + - + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - <br> + - + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - <br> + - + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + - + <br> - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + - + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - <br> + - + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + - + <br> - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + - + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - <br> + - + <hr> - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + - + == Additional Information == - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + - + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - <br> + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <br> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + • 60% affordability - + • 50-year minimum - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - <hr> + <br> - == Additional Information == + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + <br> - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - + • Administrative approval - <br> + • Nondiscrimination requirements - + • Taxation provisions - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + <br> - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + - + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - <br> + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - + • Reduces displacement - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - • 60% affordability + - • 50-year minimum + <br> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + - + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - <br> + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + <br> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + - + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - <br> + • Reduces litigation risk - + • Encourages nonprofit participation - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - • Administrative approval + - • Nondiscrimination requirements + [[Category:2026 Session]] - • Taxation provisions - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - - <br> - - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - • Reduces displacement - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - - <br> - - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - - <br> - - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - • Reduces litigation risk - • Encourages nonprofit participation - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:29:33
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— - 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 McPike + 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 (McPike). 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about our faith in delivering housing to the Commonwealth. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:27:51
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 McPike 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... - It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + It's about our faith in delivering housing to the Commonwealth. - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + I ask you to report this bill. - It's about the faith — don't lose it. + <hr> - I ask you to report this bill. + === House Committee Statement === - + n/a - <hr> + - + === Floor Statement === - === House Committee Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - === Floor Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + === Senate Committee Statement === - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + <hr> - === Senate Committee Statement === + - n/a + == Support and Opposition == - <hr> + === Support === - + • Faith-based housing advocates - == Support and Opposition == + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - === Support === + - • Faith-based housing advocates + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - === Opposition === + === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + - + <hr> - === No Recommendation === + - • (To be updated) + == Fiscal Impact == - <hr> + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - == Fiscal Impact == + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + <hr> - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + == Possible Questions == - <hr> + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - == Possible Questions == + === TL;DR === - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - === TL;DR === + - + <br> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <br> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + <hr> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + == Additional Information == - <hr> + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - == Additional Information == + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + <br> - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - <br> + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + <br> - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - + • 60% affordability - <br> + • 50-year minimum - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + - • 60% affordability + <br> - • 50-year minimum + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - <br> + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + <br> - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - + • Administrative approval - <br> + • Nondiscrimination requirements - + • Taxation provisions - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - • Administrative approval + - • Nondiscrimination requirements + <br> - • Taxation provisions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - <br> + • Reduces displacement - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + <br> - • Reduces displacement + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - <br> + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + <br> - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - + • Reduces litigation risk - <br> + • Encourages nonprofit participation - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + - • Reduces litigation risk + [[Category:2026 Session]] - • Encourages nonprofit participation - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:27:08
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 McPike 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. This bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: If you claim authority, then you must deliver. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:26:24
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 McPike - 2) Clarifies that affordable-housing provisions override conflicting laws, explicitly include households at or below income limits, require recorded affordability restrictions, limit local setback and dimensional rules, allow higher densities in revitalization areas, and restrict local zoning controls over qualifying nonprofit and religious housing projects. + 2) Adds a limited preemption clause to subsection A, clarify that affordability applies to households at or below income limits and must be formally recorded, and allow higher minimum densities in designated revitalization areas. They also add a setback cap and narrow the local authority by tightening and trimming the dimensional standards language in subsection D <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> - I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. + - + HB1279 creates a by-right, administrative approval path for affordable housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations and certain 501(c)(3) nonprofits. It bars discretionary zoning hurdles like SUPs, rezonings, or special exceptions, requires 60% of units affordable for 50 years, makes the completed housing taxable unless locally exempted, and takes effect September 1, 2026. - I rise today to speak about conscience... + - About responsibility. + That's what the bill does, but I want to speak to what this bill is: it's <i>not just</i> about zoning, it's a bill about what we mean when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." - About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." + <br> - <br> + Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. - Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. + We have mastered the art of excuse. - We have mastered the art of excuse. + We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” - We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” + <br> - <br> + And all the while, the question remains unanswered: - And all the while, the question remains unanswered: + - + Where are the houses? - Where are the houses? + Where are the homes? - Where are the homes? + Where is the shelter for God’s people? - Where is the shelter for God’s people? + - + Luke 9:58... - Luke 9:58... + <blockquote> - <blockquote> + Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." - Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." + </blockquote> - </blockquote> + - + <br> - <br> + - + So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? - So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? + - + Matthew 25:35... - Matthew 25:35... + <blockquote> - <blockquote> + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + </blockquote> - </blockquote> + - + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + - + He said: You welcomed me. - He said: You welcomed me. + - + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. + - + <br> - <br> + - + This bill says something very simple: - This bill says something very simple: + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + - + This bill says: - This bill says: + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + - + <br> - <br> + - + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. + - + It was designed. - It was designed. + - + It was planned. - It was planned. + - + It was written into law. - It was written into law. + - + They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. - They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. + - + Communities boxed out. - Communities boxed out. + Neighborhoods erased. - Neighborhoods erased. + People told: “You do not belong here.” - People told: “You do not belong here.” + - + And then we called it “order.” - And then we called it “order.” + We called it “character.” - We called it “character.” + We called it “property values.” - We called it “property values.” + - + <br> - <br> + - + But the Bible calls it something else. - But the Bible calls it something else. + - + James 5:4... - James 5:4... + <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> - <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> + - + Those cries are still ringing. - Those cries are still ringing. + - + They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. - They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. + They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. - They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. + They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. - They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. + <br> - <br> + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + - + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + We say, “Yes, we care.” - We say, “Yes, we care.” + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + - + But when it is time to build— - But when it is time to build— + When it is time to change— - When it is time to change— + When it is time to sacrifice— - When it is time to sacrifice— + - + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + Too dense. - Too dense. + Too different. - Too different. + Too difficult. - Too difficult. + <br> - <br> + - + HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. - HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. + - + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + - + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + - + <br> - <br> + - + And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. - And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. + - + Because it asks a direct question: - Because it asks a direct question: + - + If you say you care about housing— - If you say you care about housing— + If you say you care about working families— - If you say you care about working families— + If you say you care about the Son of Man— - If you say you care about the Son of Man— + - + So where is the <i>promised land</i>? - So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + - + Where are the <b>houses</b>? - Where are the <b>houses</b>? + - + Where are the <b>homes</b>? - Where are the <b>homes</b>? + - + Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? - Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? + <br> - <br> + The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... - The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + Not tomorrow. - Not tomorrow. + - + Now. - Now. + - + <br> - <br> + - + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + - + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + - + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + - + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + <br> - <br> + HB 1279 is about what we know... - HB 1279 is about what we know... + - + It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + - + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + - + It's about the faith — don't lose it. - It's about the faith — don't lose it. + - + I ask you to report this bill. - I ask you to report this bill. + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + === House Committee Statement === - === House Committee Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + === Floor Statement === - === Floor Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + === Senate Committee Statement === - === Senate Committee Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + == Support and Opposition == - == Support and Opposition == + - + === Support === - === Support === + • Faith-based housing advocates - • Faith-based housing advocates + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + - + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + - + === Opposition === - === Opposition === + • (To be updated) - • (To be updated) + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + - + === No Recommendation === - === No Recommendation === + • (To be updated) - • (To be updated) + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + == Fiscal Impact == - == Fiscal Impact == + - + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + - + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + == Possible Questions == - == Possible Questions == + - + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + - + === TL;DR === - === TL;DR === + - + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + - + <br> - <br> + - + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + - + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + - + <br> - <br> + - + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + - + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + - + <br> - <br> + - + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + - + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + - + <br> - <br> + - + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + - + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + - + <br> - <br> + - + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + == Additional Information == - == Additional Information == + - + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + - + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + • 60% affordability - • 60% affordability + • 50-year minimum - • 50-year minimum + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + • Administrative approval - • Administrative approval + • Nondiscrimination requirements - • Nondiscrimination requirements + • Taxation provisions - • Taxation provisions + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + • Reduces displacement - • Reduces displacement + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Reduces litigation risk - • Reduces litigation risk + • Encourages nonprofit participation - • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + - + [[Category:2026 Session]] - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:25:43
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> What the amendments do— 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 McPike - 2) Clarifies that its affordable-housing provisions override conflicting laws, explicitly include households at or below income limits, require recorded affordability restrictions, limit local setback and dimensional rules, allow higher densities in revitalization areas, and restrict local zoning controls over qualifying nonprofit and religious housing projects. + 2) Clarifies that affordable-housing provisions override conflicting laws, explicitly include households at or below income limits, require recorded affordability restrictions, limit local setback and dimensional rules, allow higher densities in revitalization areas, and restrict local zoning controls over qualifying nonprofit and religious housing projects. <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - They should not have to hire lawyers. + This bill says: - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. + - + <br> - No, this bill says: + - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. - <br> + It was designed. - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. + It was planned. - It was designed. + It was written into law. - It was planned. + They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. - It was written into law. + Communities boxed out. - + Neighborhoods erased. - They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. + People told: “You do not belong here.” - Communities boxed out. + And then we called it “order.” - Neighborhoods erased. + We called it “character.” - People told: “You do not belong here.” + We called it “property values.” - And then we called it “order.” + <br> - We called it “character.” + - We called it “property values.” + But the Bible calls it something else. - <br> + James 5:4... - + <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> - But the Bible calls it something else. + - + Those cries are still ringing. - James 5:4... + - <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> + They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. - + They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. - Those cries are still ringing. + They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. - + <br> - They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. + - They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - <br> + We say, “Yes, we care.” - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + But when it is time to build— - We say, “Yes, we care.” + When it is time to change— - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + When it is time to sacrifice— - But when it is time to build— + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - When it is time to change— + Too dense. - When it is time to sacrifice— + Too different. - + Too difficult. - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + <br> - Too dense. + - Too different. + HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. - Too difficult. + - <br> + It says: Faith without works is dead. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + - + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. + - + <br> - It says: Faith without works is dead. + - + And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + - + Because it asks a direct question: - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + - <br> + If you say you care about housing— - This bill does not eliminate standards. + If you say you care about working families— - It does not eliminate safety. + If you say you care about the Son of Man— - It does not eliminate accountability. + - <br> + So where is the <i>promised land</i>? - It requires affordability. + - It requires nondiscrimination. + Where are the <b>houses</b>? - It requires a fair hearing. + - <br> + Where are the <b>homes</b>? - What it eliminates is obstruction. + - <br> + Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + <br> - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... - It eliminates "no" as the default. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - <br> + - And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. + Not tomorrow. - Because it asks a direct question: + Now. - If you say you care about housing— + <br> - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about the Son of Man— + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. - So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - Where are the <b>houses</b>? + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - Where are the <b>homes</b>? + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. - + <br> - Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? + HB 1279 is about what we know... - <br> + - The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. - Not tomorrow. + - + It's about the faith — don't lose it. - Now. + - + I ask you to report this bill. - <br> + - + <hr> - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + - + === House Committee Statement === - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + n/a - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + === Floor Statement === - + n/a - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + - <br> + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - HB 1279 is about what we know... + n/a - It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + === Senate Committee Statement === - + n/a - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + - + <hr> - It's about the faith — don't lose it. + - + == Support and Opposition == - I ask you to report this bill. + - + === Support === - <hr> + • Faith-based housing advocates - + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - === House Committee Statement === + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - n/a + - + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - === Floor Statement === + - n/a + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - n/a + - + === No Recommendation === - === Senate Committee Statement === + • (To be updated) - n/a + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + == Fiscal Impact == - == Support and Opposition == + - + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - === Support === + - • Faith-based housing advocates + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + <hr> - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + == Possible Questions == - === Opposition === + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - • (To be updated) + - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + === TL;DR === - === No Recommendation === + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - • (To be updated) + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <hr> + <br> - == Fiscal Impact == + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + - + <br> - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + - + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - <hr> + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - == Possible Questions == + <br> - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - === TL;DR === + - + <br> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <br> + - + <br> - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + - + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + - + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <br> + - + <br> - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + - + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + - + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + - + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <br> + - + <br> - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + - + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + - + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + - + <hr> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + - + == Additional Information == - <br> + - + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + <br> - <br> + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + - + <br> - <hr> + - + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - == Additional Information == + • 60% affordability - + • 50-year minimum - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + <br> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + - + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + <br> - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + • Administrative approval - + • Nondiscrimination requirements - <br> + • Taxation provisions - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + - • 60% affordability + <br> - • 50-year minimum + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - <br> + • Reduces displacement - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + <br> - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - <br> + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + - • Administrative approval + <br> - • Nondiscrimination requirements + - • Taxation provisions + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + • Reduces litigation risk - + • Encourages nonprofit participation - <br> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + [[Category:2026 Session]] - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - • Reduces displacement - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - - <br> - - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - - <br> - - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - • Reduces litigation risk - • Encourages nonprofit participation - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:17:11
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> - <hr> + What the amendments do— - Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— + 1) it brings the bill in line with SB388 McPike - <br> + - I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. + 2) Clarifies that its affordable-housing provisions override conflicting laws, explicitly include households at or below income limits, require recorded affordability restrictions, limit local setback and dimensional rules, allow higher densities in revitalization areas, and restrict local zoning controls over qualifying nonprofit and religious housing projects. - I rise today to speak about conscience... + <hr> - About responsibility. + - About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." + Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> - Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. + I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. - We have mastered the art of excuse. + - We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” + I rise today to speak about conscience... - <br> + About responsibility. - And all the while, the question remains unanswered: + About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." - + <br> - Where are the houses? + Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. - Where are the homes? + We have mastered the art of excuse. - Where is the shelter for God’s people? + We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” - + <br> - Luke 9:58... + And all the while, the question remains unanswered: - <blockquote> + - Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." + Where are the houses? - </blockquote> + Where are the homes? - + Where is the shelter for God’s people? - <br> + - + Luke 9:58... - So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? + <blockquote> - + Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." - Matthew 25:35... + </blockquote> - <blockquote> + - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + <br> - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? - </blockquote> + - + Matthew 25:35... - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + <blockquote> - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - He said: You welcomed me. + </blockquote> - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - <br> + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - This bill says something very simple: + He said: You welcomed me. - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + - + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. - They should not have to hire lawyers. + - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + <br> - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. + - + This bill says something very simple: - No, this bill says: + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + - + They should not have to hire lawyers. - <br> + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. + - + No, this bill says: - It was designed. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - It was planned. + <br> - It was written into law. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. - They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. + It was designed. - Communities boxed out. + It was planned. - Neighborhoods erased. + - People told: “You do not belong here.” + It was written into law. - And then we called it “order.” + They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. - We called it “character.” + - We called it “property values.” + Communities boxed out. - + Neighborhoods erased. - <br> + People told: “You do not belong here.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - James 5:4... + We called it “property values.” - <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> + - + <br> - Those cries are still ringing. + - + But the Bible calls it something else. - They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. + - They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. + James 5:4... - They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. + <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> - <br> + - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + Those cries are still ringing. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. - + <br> - But when it is time to build— + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - Too dense. + - Too different. + But when it is time to build— - Too difficult. + When it is time to change— - <br> + When it is time to sacrifice— - Always too much for those who already have everything. + - + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. + Too dense. - + Too different. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + Too difficult. - + <br> - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. - <br> + - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - <br> + - It requires affordability. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It requires nondiscrimination. + <br> - It requires a fair hearing. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - <br> + It does not eliminate safety. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It does not eliminate accountability. <br> - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + It requires affordability. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + It requires nondiscrimination. - It eliminates "no" as the default. + It requires a fair hearing. <br> - And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - + <br> - Because it asks a direct question: + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - If you say you care about housing— + It eliminates "no" as the default. - If you say you care about working families— + <br> - If you say you care about the Son of Man— + And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. - So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + Because it asks a direct question: - Where are the <b>houses</b>? + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Where are the <b>homes</b>? + If you say you care about the Son of Man— - Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? + So where is the <i>promised land</i>? - <br> + - The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + Where are the <b>houses</b>? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + Where are the <b>homes</b>? - Not tomorrow. + - + Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? - Now. + <br> - + The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... - <br> + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + Not tomorrow. - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + Now. - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + <br> - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. - <br> + - HB 1279 is about what we know... + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. - + <br> - It's about the faith — don't lose it. + HB 1279 is about what we know... - I ask you to report this bill. + It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - <hr> + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. - === House Committee Statement === + It's about the faith — don't lose it. - n/a + - + I ask you to report this bill. - === Floor Statement === + - n/a + <hr> - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + === House Committee Statement === n/a - === Senate Committee Statement === + === Floor Statement === n/a - <hr> + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - + n/a - == Support and Opposition == + - + === Senate Committee Statement === - === Support === + n/a - • Faith-based housing advocates + - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + <hr> - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + - + == Support and Opposition == - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + - + === Support === - === Opposition === + • Faith-based housing advocates - • (To be updated) + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - === No Recommendation === + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - • (To be updated) + - + === Opposition === - <hr> + • (To be updated) - + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - == Fiscal Impact == + - + === No Recommendation === - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + • (To be updated) - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + <hr> - <hr> + == Fiscal Impact == - == Possible Questions == + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - === TL;DR === + <hr> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + == Possible Questions == - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + - + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - <br> + - + === TL;DR === - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <br> + - + <br> - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + - + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <hr> + <br> - == Additional Information == + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + <hr> - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + - + == Additional Information == - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + - + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - <br> + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - • 60% affordability + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - • 50-year minimum + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + • 60% affordability - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + • 50-year minimum - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - • Administrative approval + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - • Nondiscrimination requirements + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - • Taxation provisions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + <br> - <br> + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - + • Administrative approval - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + • Nondiscrimination requirements - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + • Taxation provisions - • Reduces displacement + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + • Reduces displacement - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + - + <br> - <br> + - + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - • Reduces litigation risk + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + - + <br> - [[Category:2026 Session]] + + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Reduces litigation risk + • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:13:51
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. - They formed the board so they hoard... land and power. + Communities boxed out. - + Neighborhoods erased. - Communities boxed out. + People told: “You do not belong here.” - Neighborhoods erased. + - People told: “You do not belong here.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - And then we called it “order.” + We called it “property values.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “property values.” + <br> - <br> + But the Bible calls it something else. - But the Bible calls it something else. + James 5:4... - + <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> - James 5:4... + - <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> + Those cries are still ringing. - Those cries are still ringing. + They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. - + They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. - They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. + They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. - They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. + <br> - They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - <br> + - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - But when it is time to build— + When it is time to sacrifice— - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - + Too dense. - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + Too different. - Too dense. + Too difficult. - Too different. + <br> - Too difficult. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - <br> + - Always too much for those who already have everything. + HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. - HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - + <br> - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - <br> + It does not eliminate safety. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It does not eliminate safety. + <br> - It does not eliminate accountability. + It requires affordability. - <br> + It requires nondiscrimination. - It requires affordability. + It requires a fair hearing. - It requires nondiscrimination. + <br> - It requires a fair hearing. + What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - <br> + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + It eliminates "no" as the default. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + <br> - It eliminates "no" as the default. + And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. - <br> + - And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. + Because it asks a direct question: - Because it asks a direct question: + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - If you say you care about housing— + If you say you care about the Son of Man— - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about the Son of Man— + So where is the <i>promised land</i>? - So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + Where are the <b>houses</b>? - Where are the <b>houses</b>? + Where are the <b>homes</b>? - Where are the <b>homes</b>? + Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? - + <br> - Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? + The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... - <br> + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + Not tomorrow. - Not tomorrow. + Now. - Now. + <br> - <br> + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. - + <br> - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + HB 1279 is about what we know... - <br> + - HB 1279 is about what we know... + It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + It's about the faith — don't lose it. - It's about the faith — don't lose it. + I ask you to report this bill. - I ask you to report this bill. + <hr> - <hr> + === House Committee Statement === - + n/a - === House Committee Statement === + - n/a + === Floor Statement === - + n/a - === Floor Statement === + - n/a + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - + n/a - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + - n/a + === Senate Committee Statement === - + n/a - === Senate Committee Statement === + - n/a + <hr> - <hr> + == Support and Opposition == - == Support and Opposition == + === Support === - + • Faith-based housing advocates - === Support === + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - • Faith-based housing advocates + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - === Opposition === + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - • (To be updated) + - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + === No Recommendation === - + • (To be updated) - === No Recommendation === + - • (To be updated) + <hr> - <hr> + == Fiscal Impact == - == Fiscal Impact == + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + <hr> - <hr> + == Possible Questions == - == Possible Questions == + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + === TL;DR === - === TL;DR === + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + <br> - <br> + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + <br> - <br> + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + <br> - <br> + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + <br> - <br> + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + <br> - <br> + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + <br> - <br> + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + <hr> - <hr> + == Additional Information == - == Additional Information == + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <br> - <br> + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + <br> - <br> + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - + • 60% affordability - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + • 50-year minimum - • 60% affordability + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - • 50-year minimum + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + <br> - <br> + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + <br> - <br> + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - + • Administrative approval - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + • Nondiscrimination requirements - • Administrative approval + • Taxation provisions - • Nondiscrimination requirements + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - • Taxation provisions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + <br> - <br> + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + • Reduces displacement - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - • Reduces displacement + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + <br> - <br> + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + <br> - <br> + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - + • Reduces litigation risk - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Encourages nonprofit participation - • Reduces litigation risk + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - • Encourages nonprofit participation + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + [[Category:2026 Session]] - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 12:03:26
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
Edited by: 198.246.136.35
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. They formed the board so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + HB 1279 rejects that <b>hypocrisy</b>. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 11:01:27
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. - They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. + They formed the board so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 11:00:09
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. - They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <i><b>people</b></i>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. + They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <b>people</b>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:59:28
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. - They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated <b>uses</b>... they segregated <i><b>people</b></i>: <i>exclusionary</i> zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:59:11
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. - They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + They drew <i><b>red lines</b></i>. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:58:30
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did <b>not</b> <i>fall from heaven</i>, it's a <b>product of man</b>. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:57:54
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] <hr> == Overview == === Summary as Introduced === Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. <hr> === Patrons === ==== House Patrons ==== • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) • Shelly Simonds ==== Senate Patrons ==== • None <hr> == Language == The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. <hr> == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. <hr> === House Committee Statement === n/a === Floor Statement === n/a === Senate Subcommittee Statement === n/a === Senate Committee Statement === n/a <hr> == Support and Opposition == === Support === • Faith-based housing advocates • Commonwealth Housing Coalition • VOICE and allied faith organizations Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… === Opposition === • (To be updated) • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) <hr> == Fiscal Impact == There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. <hr> == Possible Questions == This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. === TL;DR === <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. <br> <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. <br> <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. <br> <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. <br> <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. <br> === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. <br> === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. <br> === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. <br> === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. <br> === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. <hr> == Additional Information == <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… <br> <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. <br> <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> • 60% affordability • 50-year minimum <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. <br> <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation • Faith-owned land is often underutilized <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. <br> <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> • Administrative approval • Nondiscrimination requirements • Taxation provisions <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. <br> <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers • Reduces displacement <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. <br> <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies • Reduces reliance on public subsidies <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. <br> <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> • Reduces litigation risk • Encourages nonprofit participation <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:56:48
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Status == - [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 + [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] - Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] + - + <hr> - <hr> + - + == Overview == - == Overview == + - + === Summary as Introduced === - === Summary as Introduced === + - + Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. - Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. + - + The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. - The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. + - + <hr> - 1087999 (1) + - + === Patrons === - <hr> + - + ==== House Patrons ==== - === Patrons === + • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) - + • Shelly Simonds - ==== House Patrons ==== + - • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) + ==== Senate Patrons ==== - • Shelly Simonds + • None - ==== Senate Patrons ==== + <hr> - • None + - + == Language == - <hr> + - + The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 HB1279] can be viewed here. - == Language == + - + <hr> - The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 + - HB1279] can be viewed here. + == Opening Statement == - <hr> + === House Subcommittee Statement === - == Opening Statement == + <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> - === House Subcommittee Statement === + <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> - <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> + <hr> - <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> + Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— - + <br> - <hr> + I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. - Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— + I rise today to speak about conscience... - <br> + About responsibility. - I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. + About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." - + <br> - I rise today to speak about conscience... + Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. - About responsibility. + We have mastered the art of excuse. - About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." + We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> - Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. + And all the while, the question remains unanswered: - We have mastered the art of excuse. + - We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” + Where are the houses? - <br> + Where are the homes? - And all the while, the question remains unanswered: + Where is the shelter for God’s people? - Where are the houses? + Luke 9:58... - Where are the homes? + <blockquote> - Where is the shelter for God’s people? + Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." - + </blockquote> - Luke 9:58... + - <blockquote> + <br> - Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." + - </blockquote> + So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? - <br> + Matthew 25:35... - + <blockquote> - So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - Matthew 25:35... + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - <blockquote> + </blockquote> - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - </blockquote> + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + He said: You welcomed me. - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. - He said: You welcomed me. + <br> - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. + This bill says something very simple: - + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - <br> + - + They should not have to hire lawyers. - This bill says something very simple: + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. - They should not have to hire lawyers. + No, this bill says: - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. + - + <br> - No, this bill says: + - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. - <br> + It was designed. - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. + It was planned. - It was designed. + It was written into law. - It was planned. + They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. - It was written into law. + They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + Communities boxed out. - + Neighborhoods erased. - They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. + People told: “You do not belong here.” - Communities boxed out. + And then we called it “order.” - Neighborhoods erased. + We called it “character.” - People told: “You do not belong here.” + We called it “property values.” - And then we called it “order.” + <br> - We called it “character.” + - We called it “property values.” + But the Bible calls it something else. - <br> + James 5:4... - + <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> - But the Bible calls it something else. + - + Those cries are still ringing. - James 5:4... + - <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> + They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. - + They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. - Those cries are still ringing. + They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. - + <br> - They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. + - They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - <br> + We say, “Yes, we care.” - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + But when it is time to build— - We say, “Yes, we care.” + When it is time to change— - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + When it is time to sacrifice— - But when it is time to build— + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - When it is time to change— + Too dense. - When it is time to sacrifice— + Too different. - + Too difficult. - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + <br> - Too dense. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - Too different. + - Too difficult. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - <br> + - Always too much for those who already have everything. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - + <br> - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It does not eliminate accountability. <br> - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It requires affordability. - It does not eliminate safety. + It requires nondiscrimination. - It does not eliminate accountability. + It requires a fair hearing. <br> - It requires affordability. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - It requires nondiscrimination. + <br> - It requires a fair hearing. + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - <br> + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates "no" as the default. + Because it asks a direct question: - <br> + - And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Because it asks a direct question: + If you say you care about the Son of Man— - If you say you care about housing— + So where is the <i>promised land</i>? - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about the Son of Man— + Where are the <b>houses</b>? - So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + Where are the <b>homes</b>? - Where are the <b>houses</b>? + Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? - + <br> - Where are the <b>homes</b>? + The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... - + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? + - <br> + Not tomorrow. - The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + Now. - Not tomorrow. + <br> - Now. + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. - <br> + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. - + <br> - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + HB 1279 is about what we know... - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - <br> + - HB 1279 is about what we know... + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. - It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + It's about the faith — don't lose it. - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + I ask you to report this bill. - It's about the faith — don't lose it. + <hr> - I ask you to report this bill. + === House Committee Statement === - + n/a - <hr> + - + === Floor Statement === - === House Committee Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === - === Floor Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + === Senate Committee Statement === - === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + n/a - n/a + - + <hr> - === Senate Committee Statement === + - n/a + == Support and Opposition == - <hr> + === Support === - + • Faith-based housing advocates - == Support and Opposition == + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition - + • VOICE and allied faith organizations - === Support === + - • Faith-based housing advocates + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + - • VOICE and allied faith organizations + === Opposition === - + • (To be updated) - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) - === Opposition === + === No Recommendation === • (To be updated) - • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + - + <hr> - === No Recommendation === + - • (To be updated) + == Fiscal Impact == - <hr> + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. - == Fiscal Impact == + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. - There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + <hr> - Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + == Possible Questions == - <hr> + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. - == Possible Questions == + === TL;DR === - This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> - + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. - === TL;DR === + - + <br> - <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + - TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> - + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + - TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> - + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + - TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> - + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + - TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> - + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. - <br> + - + <br> - <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + - TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. - === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. - === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. - <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. - === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. - <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === - <br> + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. - === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. - <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. - <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + <br> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === - <br> + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. - === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + <hr> - <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + == Additional Information == - <hr> + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> - + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes - == Additional Information == + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. - <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + - • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… - • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + <br> - Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> - + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 - <br> + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions - + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. - <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + - • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + <br> - • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> - + • 60% affordability - <br> + • 50-year minimum - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. - <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + - • 60% affordability + <br> - • 50-year minimum + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> - + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation - <br> + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. - <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + - • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + <br> - • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> - + • Administrative approval - <br> + • Nondiscrimination requirements - + • Taxation provisions - <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. - • Administrative approval + - • Nondiscrimination requirements + <br> - • Taxation provisions + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> - + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers - <br> + • Reduces displacement - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. - <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + - • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + <br> - • Reduces displacement + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> - + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies - <br> + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. - <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + - • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + <br> - • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + - <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> - + • Reduces litigation risk - <br> + • Encourages nonprofit participation - + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + - • Reduces litigation risk + [[Category:2026 Session]] - • Encourages nonprofit participation - <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:56:10
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = - == Opening Statement == + == Status == - + [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H07002/agendas/5252 - === House Subcommittee Statement === + Counties, Cities and Towns — Subcommittee — 2026] - <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> + - + <hr> - <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> + - + == Overview == - <hr> + - + === Summary as Introduced === - Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— + - <br> + Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. Allows for the by-right development and construction of housing on land owned by property tax-exempt religious organizations or certain 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations. Requires that such housing developments be approved administratively and prohibits localities from requiring special exceptions, special use permits, conditional use permits, rezonings, or other discretionary review processes. - I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. + - + The bill requires that at least 60 percent of units be affordable and that affordability be preserved for a minimum of 50 years. All completed housing is subject to local real property taxation unless explicitly exempted by the locality. The bill establishes minimum height, density, and parking standards and provides a delayed effective date of September 1, 2026. - I rise today to speak about conscience... + - About responsibility. + 1087999 (1) - About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." + - <br> + <hr> - Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. + - We have mastered the art of excuse. + === Patrons === - We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” + - <br> + ==== House Patrons ==== - And all the while, the question remains unanswered: + • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron) - + • Shelly Simonds - Where are the houses? + - Where are the homes? + ==== Senate Patrons ==== - Where is the shelter for God’s people? + • None - Luke 9:58... + <hr> - <blockquote> + - Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." + == Language == - </blockquote> + - + The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB1279/text/HB1279 - <br> + HB1279] can be viewed here. - So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? + <hr> - Matthew 25:35... + == Opening Statement == - <blockquote> + - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + === House Subcommittee Statement === - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a sermon-style format. Perform for the camera. Do not back down.</mark> - </blockquote> + - + <mark>MOVE LINE AMENDMENTS — Submitted to Jeff Sharpe / Counsel</mark> - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + <hr> - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + - + Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— - He said: You welcomed me. + <br> - + I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. + - + I rise today to speak about conscience... - <br> + About responsibility. - + About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." - This bill says something very simple: + <br> - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. - + We have mastered the art of excuse. - They should not have to hire lawyers. + We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + <br> - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. + And all the while, the question remains unanswered: - No, this bill says: + Where are the houses? - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + Where are the homes? - + Where is the shelter for God’s people? - <br> + - + Luke 9:58... - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. + <blockquote> - + Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." - It was designed. + </blockquote> - It was planned. + <br> - It was written into law. + So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? - They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + Matthew 25:35... - + <blockquote> - They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - Communities boxed out. + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - Neighborhoods erased. + </blockquote> - People told: “You do not belong here.” + - + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - And then we called it “order.” + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - We called it “character.” + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - We called it “property values.” + - + He said: You welcomed me. - <br> + - + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. - But the Bible calls it something else. + - + <br> - James 5:4... + - <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> + This bill says something very simple: - + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - Those cries are still ringing. + - + They should not have to hire lawyers. - They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. - They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. + - <br> + No, this bill says: - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + <br> - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. - But when it is time to build— + It was designed. - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + It was planned. - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + It was written into law. - Too dense. + - Too different. + They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. - Too difficult. + - <br> + They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + - + Communities boxed out. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Neighborhoods erased. - + People told: “You do not belong here.” - It says: Faith without works is dead. + - + And then we called it “order.” - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + We called it “character.” - + We called it “property values.” - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + <br> - This bill does not eliminate standards. + - It does not eliminate safety. + But the Bible calls it something else. - It does not eliminate accountability. + - <br> + James 5:4... - It requires affordability. + <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> - It requires nondiscrimination. + - It requires a fair hearing. + Those cries are still ringing. - <br> + - What it eliminates is obstruction. + They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. - <br> + They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + <br> - It eliminates "no" as the default. + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - <br> + - And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - Because it asks a direct question: + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - If you say you care about housing— + But when it is time to build— - If you say you care about working families— + When it is time to change— - If you say you care about the Son of Man— + When it is time to sacrifice— - So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - + Too dense. - Where are the <b>houses</b>? + Too different. - + Too difficult. - Where are the <b>homes</b>? + <br> - + Always too much for those who already have everything. - Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? + - <br> + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + It says: Faith without works is dead. - Not tomorrow. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - Now. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - + <br> - <br> + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + It does not eliminate accountability. - + <br> - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + It requires affordability. - + It requires nondiscrimination. - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + It requires a fair hearing. - + <br> - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> - HB 1279 is about what we know... + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + It eliminates "no" as the default. - + <br> - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. - It's about the faith — don't lose it. + Because it asks a direct question: - I ask you to report this bill. + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - [[Category:2026 Session]] + If you say you care about the Son of Man— + + So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + + Where are the <b>houses</b>? + + Where are the <b>homes</b>? + + Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? + <br> + The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + + Not tomorrow. + + Now. + + <br> + + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. + + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + <br> + HB 1279 is about what we know... + + It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + + It's about the faith — don't lose it. + + I ask you to report this bill. + + <hr> + + === House Committee Statement === + n/a + + === Floor Statement === + n/a + + === Senate Subcommittee Statement === + n/a + + === Senate Committee Statement === + n/a + + <hr> + + == Support and Opposition == + + === Support === + • Faith-based housing advocates + • Commonwealth Housing Coalition + • VOICE and allied faith organizations + + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + + === Opposition === + • (To be updated) + • Some local government associations (concerns regarding local control) + + === No Recommendation === + • (To be updated) + + <hr> + + == Fiscal Impact == + + There is no published fiscal impact statement for HB1279. + + Because housing constructed under the bill becomes subject to local property taxation upon completion, the bill may result in net positive local revenue over time. + + <hr> + + == Possible Questions == + + This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders. + + === TL;DR === + + <b>Q1: “Does this override local zoning?”</b> + TL;DR: It creates a limited by-right pathway for qualifying faith and nonprofit land, while preserving building and safety codes. + + <br> + + <b>Q2: “Is this a giveaway to churches?”</b> + TL;DR: No. Developments must provide long-term affordable housing and are taxable. + + <br> + + <b>Q3: “Does this eliminate public input?”</b> + TL;DR: It streamlines approval but retains administrative review and compliance requirements. + + <br> + + <b>Q4: “Will this hurt neighborhood character?”</b> + TL;DR: The bill sets contextual height and density standards tied to surrounding development. + + <br> + + <b>Q5: “Why require 60% affordability?”</b> + TL;DR: To ensure the policy delivers meaningful public benefit, not market-rate windfalls. + + <br> + + === Q1: “Does this override local zoning authority?” === + + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires qualifying developments to be permitted by-right. + + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Localities retain authority over building codes, health and safety standards, and administrative review. + + <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB1279 does not eliminate zoning. It creates a targeted pathway for land already owned by tax-exempt faith and nonprofit organizations to produce affordable housing without discretionary barriers. + + <br> + + === Q2: “Is this a subsidy or special treatment?” === + + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill creates special zoning treatment for qualifying properties. + + <b>What’s misleading:</b> The benefit is conditioned on long-term affordability and taxation. + + <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is not a giveaway. In exchange for streamlined approval, developers must provide at least 60% affordable units for 50 years and pay property taxes. + + <br> + + === Q3: “Does this remove community input?” === + + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill limits discretionary hearings. + + <b>What’s omitted:</b> Administrative review, code compliance, and appeal rights remain. + + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill replaces unpredictable political processes with professional, standards-based review. + + <br> + + === Q4: “Will this lead to oversized buildings?” === + + <b>What’s true:</b> The bill establishes minimum height and density allowances. + + <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Standards are tied to surrounding development patterns. + + <b>Answer you can use:</b> Projects must align with nearby built form and remain subject to the Uniform Statewide Building Code. + + <br> + + === Q5: “Why is long-term affordability required?” === + + <b>Answer you can use:</b> The 50-year requirement ensures that public benefits persist across generations and prevents short-term conversions to market-rate housing. + + <hr> + + == Additional Information == + + <b>1. Faith institutions face high barriers to housing development</b> + • Many congregations report multi-year rezoning processes + • Legal and consulting costs often exceed six figures + <b>Policy implication:</b> Streamlining reduces financial and administrative waste. + + Faith in Housing Legislation Ex… + + <br> + + <b>2. The bill builds on prior “Yes in God’s Backyard” efforts</b> + • Similar legislation introduced in 2024 and 2025 + • Broad support from housing and faith coalitions + <b>Policy implication:</b> HB1279 reflects an established reform trajectory. + + <br> + + <b>3. Long-term affordability protects public investment</b> + • 60% affordability + • 50-year minimum + <b>Policy implication:</b> Ensures sustained housing supply rather than short-term gains. + + <br> + + <b>4. Housing supply is a primary driver of affordability</b> + • Insufficient supply drives rent inflation + • Faith-owned land is often underutilized + <b>Policy implication:</b> Unlocking existing land accelerates production. + + <br> + + <b>5. The bill balances access with accountability</b> + • Administrative approval + • Nondiscrimination requirements + • Taxation provisions + <b>Policy implication:</b> Promotes equity while preserving public safeguards. + + <br> + + <b>6. Workforce and community stability benefits</b> + • Supports teachers, service workers, and caregivers + • Reduces displacement + <b>Policy implication:</b> Housing policy is economic policy. + + <br> + + <b>7. Alignment with statewide housing goals</b> + • Supports state affordability and workforce strategies + • Reduces reliance on public subsidies + <b>Policy implication:</b> Leverages private and nonprofit assets for public benefit. + + <br> + + <b>8. Consistency and predictability improve outcomes</b> + • Reduces litigation risk + • Encourages nonprofit participation + <b>Policy implication:</b> Clear rules promote responsible development. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:55:44
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> - You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not radical. + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not <i><b>radical</b></i>. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:36:29
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It requires a fair hearing. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates "no" as the default. <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the <b>houses</b>? Where are the <b>homes</b>? Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> - Friends, this is not radical. + You might think my words are <i>too <b>radical</b></i>. Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:35:59
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It requires a fair hearing. - It respects building codes. + <br> - <br> + What it eliminates is obstruction. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + <br> - <br> + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + It eliminates "no" as the default. - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + <br> - <br> + And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. - And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. + - + Because it asks a direct question: - Because it asks a direct question: + - + If you say you care about housing— - If you say you care about housing— + If you say you care about working families— - If you say you care about working families— + If you say you care about the Son of Man— - If you say you care about the Son of Man— + - + So where is the <i>promised land</i>? - So where is the <i>promised land</i>? + - + Where are the <b>houses</b>? - Where are the houses? + - + Where are the <b>homes</b>? - Where are the homes? + - + Where are the <b><i>deliverables</i></b> we've been promised again and again? - Where is the justice? + <br> - <br> + The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... - The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + Not tomorrow. - Not tomorrow. + - + Now. - Now. + - + <br> - <br> + - + Friends, this is not radical. - Friends, this is not radical. + - + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. + - + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. + - + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. + <br> - <br> + HB 1279 is about what we know... - HB 1279 is about what we know... + - + It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. + - + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. + - + It's about the faith — don't lose it. - It's about the faith — don't lose it. + - + I ask you to report this bill. - I ask you to report this bill. + - + [[Category:2026 Session]] - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:35:02
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put up on the shelf. + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put on the shelf. - It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. + It's about the faith — don't lose it. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:31:49
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - It's about the hope we used to feel, but have but up on the shelf. + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have put up on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:30:41
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - It's about the hope we've put on the shelf. + It's about the hope we used to feel, but have but up on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:30:36
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... - It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. + It's about the sermons you heard in your youth. - It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. + It's about the hope we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:30:07
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is how life must be. + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is alright. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:29:19
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless the committee that will deny another housing project. + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless a committee that will deny another housing project. - What is <b>radical</b> is pretending this is how life must be. + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending that this is how life must be. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:29:07
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. - + <br> And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - <br> + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless the committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending this is how life must be. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:28:03
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in overcrowded tenements. + They are ringing in the overcrowded tenements. - They are ringing in cars where a man spends another freezing night. + They are ringing in the car where a man spends another freezing night. - They are ringing in families that move out the block cause they can't afford it no more. + They are ringing in the stories of the families that moved out the block cause they got <i>priced out</i>. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. <br> We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless the committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending this is how life must be. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:27:11
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in cars where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in families that move out the block cause they can't afford it no more. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. <br> We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - <br> + But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— - <br> + Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless the committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending this is how life must be. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:23:52
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in cars where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in families that move out the block cause they can't afford it no more. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. <br> We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” <br> But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— <br> Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. - Too inconvenient. + Too difficult. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless the committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending this is how life must be. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:23:22
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— - + <br> I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in cars where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in families that move out the block cause they can't afford it no more. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. <br> We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” <br> But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— <br> Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too inconvenient. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless the committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending this is how life must be. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:22:32
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in overcrowded tenements. They are ringing in cars where a man spends another freezing night. They are ringing in families that move out the block cause they can't afford it no more. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. <br> We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” <br> But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— <br> Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too inconvenient. <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” <br> And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about the Son of Man— So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? <br> The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - <br> + Not tomorrow. Now. <br> Friends, this is not radical. What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless the committee that will deny another housing project. What is <b>radical</b> is pretending this is how life must be. <br> HB 1279 is about what we know... It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. I ask you to report this bill. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:22:16
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Communities boxed out. Neighborhoods erased. People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “property values.” <br> But the Bible calls it something else. James 5:4... <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + They are ringing in overcrowded tenements. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + They are ringing in cars where a man spends another freezing night. - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + They are ringing in families that move out the block cause they can't afford it no more. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - + <br> We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - + <br> But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— - + <br> Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too inconvenient. - + <br> Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - + <br> This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. - + <br> It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. - + <br> What it eliminates is obstruction. - + <br> It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - + <br> - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + And that is why this bill makes people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— - If you say you care about faith communities— + If you say you care about the Son of Man— - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + So where is the <i>promised land</i>? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? - + <br> - The prophet Isaiah said: + The prophet Isaiah, 1:17... “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - + <br> Not tomorrow. - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Now. - Now. + <br> - Members, this is not radical. + Friends, this is not radical. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + What is <b>radical</b> is empty lots in a housing crisis. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is <b>radical</b> is the invocation to bless the committee that will deny another housing project. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is <b>radical</b> is pretending this is how life must be. - + <br> - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + HB 1279 is about what we know... - It chooses courage. + It's about the sermons you learned in your youth. - It chooses action. + It's about the idealism and dreams we've put on the shelf. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It's about our faith that we <i>will</i> overcome this. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + I ask you to report this bill. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + [[Category:2026 Session]] - - I ask you to report this bill. - - Not just for policy. - - For principle. - - Not just for housing. - - For justice. - - Not just for today. - - For the soul of our Commonwealth. - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:21:43
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - Whole communities were boxed out. + Communities boxed out. - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + Neighborhoods erased. - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + People told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” - We called it “protecting property values.” + We called it “property values.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + <br> - James chapter 5 says: + But the Bible calls it something else. - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + - + James 5:4... - Those cries are still ringing. + <blockquote>“The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.”</blockquote> - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - But when it is time to build— + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + When it is time to sacrifice— - Too dense. + - Too different. + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Too inconvenient. + Too dense. - + Too different. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + Too inconvenient. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - It requires affordability. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It requires nondiscrimination. + - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It requires affordability. - It respects building codes. + It requires nondiscrimination. - + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It respects building codes. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - Because it asks a direct question: + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - If you say you care about housing— + Because it asks a direct question: - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where are the houses? + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Where are the homes? + Where are the houses? - Where is the justice? + Where are the homes? - The prophet Isaiah said: + Where is the justice? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + The prophet Isaiah said: - Not tomorrow. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Now. + Not after another study. - Members, this is not radical. + Now. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Members, this is not radical. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It chooses courage. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It chooses action. + It chooses courage. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It chooses action. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It says the time for excuses is over. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - I ask you to report this bill. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - Not just for policy. + I ask you to report this bill. - For principle. + Not just for policy. - Not just for housing. + For principle. - For justice. + Not just for housing. - Not just for today. + For justice. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + Not just for today. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:06:02
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - They should not have to hire lawyers. + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. + No, this bill says: - + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - No, this bill says: + - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + <br> Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Whole communities were boxed out. Whole neighborhoods were erased. Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “protecting property values.” But the Bible calls it something else. James chapter 5 says: “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too inconvenient. Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. What it eliminates is obstruction. It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about faith communities— Then why have you stopped them for so long? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? The prophet Isaiah said: “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Not next session. Not after another study. Now. Members, this is not radical. What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. HB 1279 chooses abundance. It chooses courage. It chooses action. It says the time for excuses is over. It says the time for half-measures is over. It says the time for moral clarity is now. I ask you to report this bill. Not just for policy. For principle. Not just for housing. For justice. Not just for today. For the soul of our Commonwealth. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:04:03
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. <br> This bill says something very simple: - <blockquote> + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors—they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + - </blockquote> + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - They should not have to hire lawyers. + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have a slice of the pie. - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + No, this bill says: - + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - No, this bill says: + - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. + It was designed. - It was designed. + It was planned. - It was planned. + It was written into law. - It was written into law. + They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. - They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. + Whole communities were boxed out. - + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - Whole communities were boxed out. + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - And then we called it “order.” + We called it “protecting property values.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “protecting property values.” + But the Bible calls it something else. - But the Bible calls it something else. + James chapter 5 says: - + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - James chapter 5 says: + - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + Those cries are still ringing. - Those cries are still ringing. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - But when it is time to build— + When it is time to sacrifice— - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - + Too dense. - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + Too different. - Too dense. + Too inconvenient. - Too different. + - Too inconvenient. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + It requires affordability. - + It requires nondiscrimination. - It requires affordability. + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - It requires nondiscrimination. + It respects building codes. - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + - It respects building codes. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + Because it asks a direct question: - Because it asks a direct question: + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - If you say you care about housing— + If you say you care about faith communities— - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + Where are the houses? - Where are the houses? + Where are the homes? - Where are the homes? + Where is the justice? - Where is the justice? + The prophet Isaiah said: - + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - The prophet Isaiah said: + - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Not tomorrow. + Not after another study. - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Now. - Now. + Members, this is not radical. - Members, this is not radical. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + It chooses courage. - It chooses courage. + It chooses action. - It chooses action. + It says the time for excuses is over. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + I ask you to report this bill. - I ask you to report this bill. + Not just for policy. - Not just for policy. + For principle. - For principle. + Not just for housing. - Not just for housing. + For justice. - For justice. + Not just for today. - Not just for today. + For the soul of our Commonwealth. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + [[Category:2026 Session]] - - [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:03:26
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. - This bill says something very simple: + <br> - <blockquote> + - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + This bill says something very simple: - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + <blockquote> - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, - </blockquote> + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— - + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - They should not have to hire lawyers. + </blockquote> - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - No, this bill says: + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + - + No, this bill says: - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - It was designed. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. - It was planned. + It was designed. - It was written into law. + It was planned. - They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + It was written into law. - They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. + They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. - Whole communities were boxed out. + They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + Whole communities were boxed out. - + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - And then we called it “order.” + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “protecting property values.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + We called it “protecting property values.” - James chapter 5 says: + But the Bible calls it something else. - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + - + James chapter 5 says: - Those cries are still ringing. + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - But when it is time to build— + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + When it is time to sacrifice— - Too dense. + - Too different. + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Too inconvenient. + Too dense. - + Too different. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + Too inconvenient. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - It requires affordability. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It requires nondiscrimination. + - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It requires affordability. - It respects building codes. + It requires nondiscrimination. - + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It respects building codes. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - Because it asks a direct question: + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - If you say you care about housing— + Because it asks a direct question: - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where are the houses? + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Where are the homes? + Where are the houses? - Where is the justice? + Where are the homes? - The prophet Isaiah said: + Where is the justice? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + The prophet Isaiah said: - Not tomorrow. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Now. + Not after another study. - Members, this is not radical. + Now. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Members, this is not radical. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It chooses courage. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It chooses action. + It chooses courage. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It chooses action. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It says the time for excuses is over. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - I ask you to report this bill. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - Not just for policy. + I ask you to report this bill. - For principle. + Not just for policy. - Not just for housing. + For principle. - For justice. + Not just for housing. - Not just for today. + For justice. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + Not just for today. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:01:37
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> <br> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that</i>... or not. This bill says something very simple: - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + <blockquote> - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— - + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - They should not have to hire lawyers. + </blockquote> - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - No, this bill says: + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + - + No, this bill says: - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - It was designed. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. - It was planned. + It was designed. - It was written into law. + It was planned. - They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + It was written into law. - They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. + They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. - Whole communities were boxed out. + They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + Whole communities were boxed out. - + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - And then we called it “order.” + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “protecting property values.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + We called it “protecting property values.” - James chapter 5 says: + But the Bible calls it something else. - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + - + James chapter 5 says: - Those cries are still ringing. + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - But when it is time to build— + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + When it is time to sacrifice— - Too dense. + - Too different. + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Too inconvenient. + Too dense. - + Too different. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + Too inconvenient. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - It requires affordability. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It requires nondiscrimination. + - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It requires affordability. - It respects building codes. + It requires nondiscrimination. - + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It respects building codes. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - Because it asks a direct question: + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - If you say you care about housing— + Because it asks a direct question: - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where are the houses? + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Where are the homes? + Where are the houses? - Where is the justice? + Where are the homes? - The prophet Isaiah said: + Where is the justice? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + The prophet Isaiah said: - Not tomorrow. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Now. + Not after another study. - Members, this is not radical. + Now. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Members, this is not radical. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It chooses courage. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It chooses action. + It chooses courage. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It chooses action. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It says the time for excuses is over. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - I ask you to report this bill. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - Not just for policy. + I ask you to report this bill. - For principle. + Not just for policy. - Not just for housing. + For principle. - For justice. + Not just for housing. - Not just for today. + For justice. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + Not just for today. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 10:01:03
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> - So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? + <br> - Matthew 25:35... + So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? - <blockquote> + - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + Matthew 25:35... - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + <blockquote> - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - </blockquote> + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + </blockquote> - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - He said: You welcomed me. + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> + He said: You welcomed me. - This bill says something very simple: + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + This bill says something very simple: - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, - + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— - They should not have to hire lawyers. + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - No, this bill says: + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + - + No, this bill says: - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - It was designed. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. - It was planned. + It was designed. - It was written into law. + It was planned. - They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + It was written into law. - They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. + They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. - Whole communities were boxed out. + They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + Whole communities were boxed out. - + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - And then we called it “order.” + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “protecting property values.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + We called it “protecting property values.” - James chapter 5 says: + But the Bible calls it something else. - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + - + James chapter 5 says: - Those cries are still ringing. + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - But when it is time to build— + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + When it is time to sacrifice— - Too dense. + - Too different. + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Too inconvenient. + Too dense. - + Too different. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + Too inconvenient. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - It requires affordability. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It requires nondiscrimination. + - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It requires affordability. - It respects building codes. + It requires nondiscrimination. - + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It respects building codes. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - Because it asks a direct question: + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - If you say you care about housing— + Because it asks a direct question: - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where are the houses? + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Where are the homes? + Where are the houses? - Where is the justice? + Where are the homes? - The prophet Isaiah said: + Where is the justice? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + The prophet Isaiah said: - Not tomorrow. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Now. + Not after another study. - Members, this is not radical. + Now. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Members, this is not radical. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It chooses courage. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It chooses action. + It chooses courage. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It chooses action. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It says the time for excuses is over. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - I ask you to report this bill. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - Not just for policy. + I ask you to report this bill. - For principle. + Not just for policy. - Not just for housing. + For principle. - For justice. + Not just for housing. - Not just for today. + For justice. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + Not just for today. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:59:57
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." - + <br> Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” - + <br> And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Whole communities were boxed out. Whole neighborhoods were erased. Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “protecting property values.” But the Bible calls it something else. James chapter 5 says: “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too inconvenient. Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. What it eliminates is obstruction. It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about faith communities— Then why have you stopped them for so long? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? The prophet Isaiah said: “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Not next session. Not after another study. Now. Members, this is not radical. What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. HB 1279 chooses abundance. It chooses courage. It chooses action. It says the time for excuses is over. It says the time for half-measures is over. It says the time for moral clarity is now. I ask you to report this bill. Not just for policy. For principle. Not just for housing. For justice. Not just for today. For the soul of our Commonwealth. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:59:38
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> <hr> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— - I rise today to speak not just about zoning. + I rise today to speak <i>not just</i> about zoning. - I rise today to speak about conscience. + I rise today to speak about conscience... About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58... <blockquote> Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." </blockquote> So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? Matthew 25:35... <blockquote> I was hungry, and you gave me food. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. </blockquote> He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” He said: You welcomed me. HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> This bill says something very simple: If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. They should not have to hire lawyers. They should not have to navigate endless hearings. They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. No, this bill says: If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. It was designed. It was planned. It was written into law. They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. Whole communities were boxed out. Whole neighborhoods were erased. Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” And then we called it “order.” We called it “character.” We called it “protecting property values.” But the Bible calls it something else. James chapter 5 says: “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” Those cries are still ringing. They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” We say, “Yes, we care.” We say, “Yes, something should be done.” But when it is time to build— When it is time to change— When it is time to sacrifice— Suddenly, it’s too tall. Too dense. Too different. Too inconvenient. Always too much for those who already have everything. HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. It says: Faith without works is dead. It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. This bill does not eliminate standards. It does not eliminate safety. It does not eliminate accountability. It requires affordability. It requires nondiscrimination. It puts housing on the tax rolls. It respects building codes. What it eliminates is obstruction. It eliminates delay as a weapon. It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. Because it asks a direct question: If you say you care about housing— If you say you care about working families— If you say you care about faith communities— Then why have you stopped them for so long? Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the justice? The prophet Isaiah said: “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” Not tomorrow. Not next session. Not after another study. Now. Members, this is not radical. What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. HB 1279 chooses abundance. It chooses courage. It chooses action. It says the time for excuses is over. It says the time for half-measures is over. It says the time for moral clarity is now. I ask you to report this bill. Not just for policy. For principle. Not just for housing. For justice. Not just for today. For the soul of our Commonwealth. [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:59:07
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> - Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— + <mark>Remember what you were told: perform for the camera. Don't back down. This is a sermon.</mark> - I rise today to speak not just about zoning. + <hr> - I rise today to speak about conscience. + Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— - About responsibility. + - About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." + I rise today to speak not just about zoning. - Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. + I rise today to speak about conscience. - We have mastered the art of excuse. + About responsibility. - We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” + About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." - And all the while, the question remains unanswered: + Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. - + We have mastered the art of excuse. - Where are the houses? + We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” - Where are the homes? + - Where is the shelter for God’s people? + And all the while, the question remains unanswered: - Luke 9:58... + Where are the houses? - <blockquote> + Where are the homes? - Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." + Where is the shelter for God’s people? - </blockquote> + - + Luke 9:58... - So will we listen to the Son of Man? + <blockquote> - + Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." - Matthew 25:35... + </blockquote> - <blockquote> + - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + So will we listen to the <b>Son of Man</b>? - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + Matthew 25:35... - </blockquote> + <blockquote> - + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + </blockquote> - He said: You welcomed me. + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - This bill says something very simple: + He said: You welcomed me. - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + - + This bill says something very simple: - They should not have to hire lawyers. + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - No, this bill says: + They should not have to hire lawyers. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. - Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. + - + No, this bill says: - It was designed. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - It was planned. + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. - It was written into law. + It was designed. - They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. + It was planned. - They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. + It was written into law. - Whole communities were boxed out. + They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - And then we called it “order.” + Whole communities were boxed out. - We called it “character.” + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - We called it “protecting property values.” + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - James chapter 5 says: + We called it “protecting property values.” - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + - + But the Bible calls it something else. - Those cries are still ringing. + - + James chapter 5 says: - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + Those cries are still ringing. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - But when it is time to build— + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - When it is time to change— + We say, “Yes, we care.” - When it is time to sacrifice— + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + But when it is time to build— - Too dense. + When it is time to change— - Too different. + When it is time to sacrifice— - Too inconvenient. + - + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + Too dense. - + Too different. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Too inconvenient. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It requires affordability. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - It requires nondiscrimination. + It does not eliminate safety. - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It respects building codes. + - + It requires affordability. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It requires nondiscrimination. - + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + It respects building codes. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + What it eliminates is obstruction. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - Because it asks a direct question: + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - If you say you care about housing— + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + Because it asks a direct question: - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Where are the houses? + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where are the homes? + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Where is the justice? + Where are the houses? - The prophet Isaiah said: + Where are the homes? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + Where is the justice? - Not tomorrow. + - Not next session. + The prophet Isaiah said: - Not after another study. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Now. + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Members, this is not radical. + Not after another study. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Now. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + Members, this is not radical. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - It chooses courage. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It chooses action. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It chooses courage. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It chooses action. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + It says the time for excuses is over. - I ask you to report this bill. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - Not just for policy. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - For principle. + I ask you to report this bill. - Not just for housing. + Not just for policy. - For justice. + For principle. - Not just for today. + Not just for housing. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + For justice. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + Not just for today. + + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:58:19
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak not just about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience. About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? - Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58: "Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." + Where is the shelter for God’s people? - So will we listen to the Son of Man? + Luke 9:58... - + <blockquote> - Matthew 25:35... + Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." - <blockquote> + </blockquote> - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + So will we listen to the Son of Man? - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + - </blockquote> + Matthew 25:35... - + <blockquote> - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - + </blockquote> - He said: You welcomed me. + - + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - This bill says something very simple: + - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + He said: You welcomed me. - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> - They should not have to hire lawyers. + This bill says something very simple: - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— - + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - This bill says: + - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - Because let’s be honest. + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. - Our housing shortage did not fall from the sky. + No, this bill says: - + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - It was designed. + - + Because let’s be honest... our housing shortage did not fall from heaven, it's a product of man. - It was planned. + - + It was designed. - It was written into law through redlining, segregation, exclusionary zoning, and land hoarding. + - + It was planned. - Whole communities were boxed out. + - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + It was written into law. - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + - + They drew red lines. They segregated uses... they segregated people: exclusionary zoning. - And then we called it “order.” + - We called it “character.” + They formed boards so they hoard... land and power. - We called it “protecting property values.” + - + Whole communities were boxed out. - But the Bible calls it something else. + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - James chapter 5 says: + - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - Those cries are still ringing. + We called it “protecting property values.” - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + But the Bible calls it something else. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + James chapter 5 says: - + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + - + Those cries are still ringing. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + - We say, “Yes, we care.” + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - But when it is time to build— + - When it is time to change— + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - When it is time to sacrifice— + - + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + We say, “Yes, we care.” - Too dense. + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - Too different. + - Too inconvenient. + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - Always too much for those who already have everything. + When it is time to sacrifice— - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - + Too dense. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + Too different. - + Too inconvenient. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + - + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + - + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + - It does not eliminate safety. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It does not eliminate accountability. + - + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - It requires affordability. + - It requires nondiscrimination. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + - It respects building codes. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + It requires affordability. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + It requires nondiscrimination. - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - + It respects building codes. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + - + What it eliminates is obstruction. - Because it asks a direct question: + - + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - If you say you care about housing— + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - If you say you care about working families— + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - If you say you care about faith communities— + - + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + - + Because it asks a direct question: - Where are the houses? + - + If you say you care about housing— - Where are the homes? + If you say you care about working families— - + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where is the justice? + - + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - The prophet Isaiah said: + - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + Where are the houses? - Not tomorrow. + Where are the homes? - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Where is the justice? - Now. + The prophet Isaiah said: - + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Members, this is not radical. + - + Not tomorrow. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Not next session. - + Not after another study. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + - + Now. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + - + Members, this is not radical. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + - + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - It chooses courage. + - + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - It chooses action. + - + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It says the time for excuses is over. + - + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + - + It chooses courage. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + - + It chooses action. - I ask you to report this bill. + - + It says the time for excuses is over. - Not just for policy. + - + It says the time for half-measures is over. - For principle. + - + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - Not just for housing. + - + I ask you to report this bill. - For justice. + - + Not just for policy. - Not just for today. + - + For principle. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + - + Not just for housing. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + + For justice. + + Not just for today. + + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:56:48
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === - <mark>Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> + <mark>NOTE: Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak not just about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience. About responsibility. - About whether we mean what we say when we talk about community, faith, and justice. + About whether we mean what we say when we talk about "community," about "faith," about "justice." Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? - Where is the shelter for God’s people? + Where is the shelter for God’s people? Luke 9:58: "Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." - Matthew 25:35... + So will we listen to the Son of Man? - <blockquote> + - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + Matthew 25:35... - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + <blockquote> - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - </blockquote> + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + </blockquote> - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - He said: You welcomed me. + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> + He said: You welcomed me. - This bill says something very simple: + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + This bill says something very simple: - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, - + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— - They should not have to hire lawyers. + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - This bill says: + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + - + This bill says: - Because let’s be honest. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - Our housing shortage did not fall from the sky. + Because let’s be honest. - It was designed. + Our housing shortage did not fall from the sky. - It was planned. + It was designed. - It was written into law through redlining, segregation, exclusionary zoning, and land hoarding. + It was planned. - Whole communities were boxed out. + It was written into law through redlining, segregation, exclusionary zoning, and land hoarding. - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + Whole communities were boxed out. - + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - And then we called it “order.” + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “protecting property values.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + We called it “protecting property values.” - James chapter 5 says: + But the Bible calls it something else. - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + - + James chapter 5 says: - Those cries are still ringing. + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - But when it is time to build— + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + When it is time to sacrifice— - Too dense. + - Too different. + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Too inconvenient. + Too dense. - + Too different. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + Too inconvenient. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - It requires affordability. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It requires nondiscrimination. + - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It requires affordability. - It respects building codes. + It requires nondiscrimination. - + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It respects building codes. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - Because it asks a direct question: + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - If you say you care about housing— + Because it asks a direct question: - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where are the houses? + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Where are the homes? + Where are the houses? - Where is the justice? + Where are the homes? - The prophet Isaiah said: + Where is the justice? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + The prophet Isaiah said: - Not tomorrow. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Now. + Not after another study. - Members, this is not radical. + Now. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Members, this is not radical. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It chooses courage. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It chooses action. + It chooses courage. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It chooses action. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It says the time for excuses is over. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - I ask you to report this bill. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - Not just for policy. + I ask you to report this bill. - For principle. + Not just for policy. - Not just for housing. + For principle. - For justice. + Not just for housing. - Not just for today. + For justice. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + Not just for today. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:51:49
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === - Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— + <mark>Deliver this in a way that makes localities drop by the office with fake apologies and asking for a confessional session</mark> - I rise today to speak not just about zoning. + Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— - I rise today to speak about conscience. + I rise today to speak not just about zoning. - About responsibility. + - About whether we mean what we say when we talk about community, faith, and justice. + I rise today to speak about conscience. - + About responsibility. - Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. + About whether we mean what we say when we talk about community, faith, and justice. - We have mastered the art of excuse. + - We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” + Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. - + We have mastered the art of excuse. - And all the while, the question remains unanswered: + We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” - Where are the houses? + And all the while, the question remains unanswered: - Where are the homes? + - Where is the shelter for God’s people? + Where are the houses? - + Where are the homes? - Matthew 25:35... + Where is the shelter for God’s people? - <blockquote> + - I was hungry, and you gave me food. + Matthew 25:35... - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + <blockquote> - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - </blockquote> + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + </blockquote> - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - He said: You welcomed me. + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> + He said: You welcomed me. - This bill says something very simple: + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + This bill says something very simple: - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, - + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— - They should not have to hire lawyers. + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - This bill says: + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + - + This bill says: - Because let’s be honest. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - Our housing shortage did not fall from the sky. + Because let’s be honest. - It was designed. + Our housing shortage did not fall from the sky. - It was planned. + It was designed. - It was written into law through redlining, segregation, exclusionary zoning, and land hoarding. + It was planned. - Whole communities were boxed out. + It was written into law through redlining, segregation, exclusionary zoning, and land hoarding. - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + Whole communities were boxed out. - + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - And then we called it “order.” + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “protecting property values.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + We called it “protecting property values.” - James chapter 5 says: + But the Bible calls it something else. - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + - + James chapter 5 says: - Those cries are still ringing. + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - But when it is time to build— + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + When it is time to sacrifice— - Too dense. + - Too different. + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Too inconvenient. + Too dense. - + Too different. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + Too inconvenient. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - It requires affordability. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It requires nondiscrimination. + - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It requires affordability. - It respects building codes. + It requires nondiscrimination. - + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It respects building codes. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - Because it asks a direct question: + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - If you say you care about housing— + Because it asks a direct question: - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where are the houses? + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Where are the homes? + Where are the houses? - Where is the justice? + Where are the homes? - The prophet Isaiah said: + Where is the justice? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + The prophet Isaiah said: - Not tomorrow. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Now. + Not after another study. - Members, this is not radical. + Now. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Members, this is not radical. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It chooses courage. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It chooses action. + It chooses courage. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It chooses action. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It says the time for excuses is over. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - I ask you to report this bill. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - Not just for policy. + I ask you to report this bill. - For principle. + Not just for policy. - Not just for housing. + For principle. - For justice. + Not just for housing. - Not just for today. + For justice. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + Not just for today. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:47:48
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = == Opening Statement == === House Subcommittee Statement === Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— I rise today to speak not just about zoning. I rise today to speak about conscience. About responsibility. About whether we mean what we say when we talk about community, faith, and justice. Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. We have mastered the art of excuse. We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” And all the while, the question remains unanswered: Where are the houses? Where are the homes? Where is the shelter for God’s people? - Jesus said in Matthew 25, + Matthew 25:35... - “I was hungry, and you gave me food. + <blockquote> - I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + I was hungry, and you gave me food. - I was a stranger, and you welcomed me.” + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. - + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me. - He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + </blockquote> - He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + - He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” - + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” - He said: You welcomed me. + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” - HB 1279 is about whether we still believe that. + He said: You welcomed me. - This bill says something very simple: + HB 1279 is about <i>whether we still believe that.</i> - If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + - and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + This bill says something very simple: - they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, - + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— - They should not have to hire lawyers. + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. - They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + - They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + They should not have to hire lawyers. - + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. - This bill says: + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. - If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + - + This bill says: - Because let’s be honest. + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. - Our housing shortage did not fall from the sky. + Because let’s be honest. - It was designed. + Our housing shortage did not fall from the sky. - It was planned. + It was designed. - It was written into law through redlining, segregation, exclusionary zoning, and land hoarding. + It was planned. - Whole communities were boxed out. + It was written into law through redlining, segregation, exclusionary zoning, and land hoarding. - Whole neighborhoods were erased. + - Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + Whole communities were boxed out. - + Whole neighborhoods were erased. - And then we called it “order.” + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” - We called it “character.” + - We called it “protecting property values.” + And then we called it “order.” - + We called it “character.” - But the Bible calls it something else. + We called it “protecting property values.” - James chapter 5 says: + But the Bible calls it something else. - “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + - + James chapter 5 says: - Those cries are still ringing. + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” - They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + Those cries are still ringing. - They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + - They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. - + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. - And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. - We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. - We say, “Yes, we care.” + - We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” - + We say, “Yes, we care.” - But when it is time to build— + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” - When it is time to change— + - When it is time to sacrifice— + But when it is time to build— - + When it is time to change— - Suddenly, it’s too tall. + When it is time to sacrifice— - Too dense. + - Too different. + Suddenly, it’s too tall. - Too inconvenient. + Too dense. - + Too different. - Always too much for those who already have everything. + Too inconvenient. - HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + Always too much for those who already have everything. - It says: Faith without works is dead. + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. - It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + It says: Faith without works is dead. - It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. - This bill does not eliminate standards. + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. - It does not eliminate safety. + - It does not eliminate accountability. + This bill does not eliminate standards. - + It does not eliminate safety. - It requires affordability. + It does not eliminate accountability. - It requires nondiscrimination. + - It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It requires affordability. - It respects building codes. + It requires nondiscrimination. - + It puts housing on the tax rolls. - What it eliminates is obstruction. + It respects building codes. - It eliminates delay as a weapon. + What it eliminates is obstruction. - It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + - It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + It eliminates delay as a weapon. - + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. - And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” - Because it asks a direct question: + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. - If you say you care about housing— + Because it asks a direct question: - If you say you care about working families— + - If you say you care about faith communities— + If you say you care about housing— - + If you say you care about working families— - Then why have you stopped them for so long? + If you say you care about faith communities— - Where are the houses? + Then why have you stopped them for so long? - Where are the homes? + Where are the houses? - Where is the justice? + Where are the homes? - The prophet Isaiah said: + Where is the justice? - “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + - + The prophet Isaiah said: - Not tomorrow. + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” - Not next session. + - Not after another study. + Not tomorrow. - + Not next session. - Now. + Not after another study. - Members, this is not radical. + Now. - What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + Members, this is not radical. - What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. - What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. - HB 1279 chooses abundance. + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. - It chooses courage. + HB 1279 chooses abundance. - It chooses action. + It chooses courage. - It says the time for excuses is over. + It chooses action. - It says the time for half-measures is over. + It says the time for excuses is over. - It says the time for moral clarity is now. + It says the time for half-measures is over. - I ask you to report this bill. + It says the time for moral clarity is now. - Not just for policy. + I ask you to report this bill. - For principle. + Not just for policy. - Not just for housing. + For principle. - For justice. + Not just for housing. - Not just for today. + For justice. - For the soul of our Commonwealth. + Not just for today. - [[Category:2026 Session]] + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:46:22
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
= HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = - Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''. + == Opening Statement == - [[Category:2026 Session]] + === House Subcommittee Statement === + Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee— + + I rise today to speak not just about zoning. + + I rise today to speak about conscience. + About responsibility. + About whether we mean what we say when we talk about community, faith, and justice. + + Because for decades in this Commonwealth, we have mastered the art of delay. + We have mastered the art of excuse. + We have mastered the art of saying, “Not here. Not now. Not like this.” + + And all the while, the question remains unanswered: + + Where are the houses? + Where are the homes? + Where is the shelter for God’s people? + + Jesus said in Matthew 25, + “I was hungry, and you gave me food. + I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. + I was a stranger, and you welcomed me.” + + He did not say, “I was hungry, and you formed a committee.” + He did not say, “I was homeless, and you scheduled another hearing.” + He did not say, “I was poor, and you told me to wait.” + + He said: You welcomed me. + + HB 1279 is about whether we still believe that. + + This bill says something very simple: + If a church, a synagogue, a mosque, or a nonprofit owns land, + and they want to use that land to house working families, seniors, veterans, and low-income neighbors— + they should not have to spend years begging permission to do the right thing. + + They should not have to hire lawyers. + They should not have to navigate endless hearings. + They should not have to fight organized resistance from people who already have more than enough. + + This bill says: + If you want to serve the poor, we will not stand in your way. + + Because let’s be honest. + + Our housing shortage did not fall from the sky. + + It was designed. + + It was planned. + + It was written into law through redlining, segregation, exclusionary zoning, and land hoarding. + + Whole communities were boxed out. + Whole neighborhoods were erased. + Whole generations were told: “You do not belong here.” + + And then we called it “order.” + We called it “character.” + We called it “protecting property values.” + + But the Bible calls it something else. + + James chapter 5 says: + “The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you.” + + Those cries are still ringing. + + They are ringing in overcrowded apartments. + They are ringing in cars where people sleep at night. + They are ringing in families forced to move farther and farther from their jobs, their schools, and their churches. + + And too often, our response has been polite sympathy and practical inaction. + + We say, “Yes, housing is a problem.” + We say, “Yes, we care.” + We say, “Yes, something should be done.” + + But when it is time to build— + When it is time to change— + When it is time to sacrifice— + + Suddenly, it’s too tall. + Too dense. + Too different. + Too inconvenient. + + Always too much for those who already have everything. + + HB 1279 rejects that hypocrisy. + + It says: Faith without works is dead. + + It says: If you claim moral leadership, then act like it. + + It says: If religious institutions want to put the Gospel into bricks and mortar, we will let them. + + This bill does not eliminate standards. + It does not eliminate safety. + It does not eliminate accountability. + + It requires affordability. + It requires nondiscrimination. + It puts housing on the tax rolls. + It respects building codes. + + What it eliminates is obstruction. + + It eliminates delay as a weapon. + It eliminates bureaucracy as a shield. + It eliminates the ability to quietly kill good projects without ever voting “no.” + + And that is why this bill makes some people uncomfortable. + + Because it asks a direct question: + + If you say you care about housing— + If you say you care about working families— + If you say you care about faith communities— + + Then why have you stopped them for so long? + + Where are the houses? + + Where are the homes? + + Where is the justice? + + The prophet Isaiah said: + “Learn to do good. Seek justice. Defend the oppressed.” + + Not tomorrow. + Not next session. + Not after another study. + + Now. + + Members, this is not radical. + + What is radical is allowing a housing crisis to deepen while land sits empty. + + What is radical is quoting scripture on Sunday and blocking housing on Monday. + + What is radical is pretending scarcity is natural when it is enforced. + + HB 1279 chooses abundance. + + It chooses courage. + + It chooses action. + + It says the time for excuses is over. + + It says the time for half-measures is over. + + It says the time for moral clarity is now. + + I ask you to report this bill. + + Not just for policy. + + For principle. + + Not just for housing. + + For justice. + + Not just for today. + + For the soul of our Commonwealth. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
2026-01-29 09:43:21
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
Edited by: 74.110.183.75
- == HB1279 Affordable housing religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties == + = HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = - + - Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''. + Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]
Initial version (2026-01-18 18:35:32)
Created by: 74.110.183.75
Created by: 74.110.183.75
- == HB1279 Affordable housing religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties == + = HB1279 Affordable housing; religious organizations and other nonprofit tax-exempt properties. = - + - Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''. + Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''. + + [[Category:2026 Session]]