Revision History: HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program and Fund established

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  <mark>There is a substitute to this bill.</mark>
  
  This substitute includes language from the previous substitute you heard last time, which is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what <b>“destruction”</b> means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within <b>90 days</b> after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For <b>antique</b> or <b>historically significant firearms</b>, agencies have up to <b>180 days</b> to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, <b>may</b> be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers (FFLs) for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The substitute also creates a defined category for <b>"historically significant firearms"</b> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.
  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this substitute adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
  We've heard at least one complaint that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that the voluntary gun give-back process has predictable standards in all localities. This guidance serves to provide clarity for both agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.
  
  I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.
  
  <hr>
  
  <mark>1/22/2026
  
  <br>
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:
  
  <blockquote>
  (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 
  
  (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 
  
  (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and
  
  (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.
  </blockquote>
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Appropriations Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mr. Chairman, for HB702: we converted the original bill into a Section 1 substitute that removes the fiscal impact on the Commonwealth and eliminates the FIS.
  
  It removes any mandates on the Virginia State Police.
  
  The bill now requires local agencies design and run their own programs and report firearm return totals to the VSP. 
  
  The bill allows the option to auction antique and historical firearms through federal firearms licensees, and any revenue gained from auctions may be used to offset program costs. 
  
  I hope it be the will of the subcommittee to report the bill to full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings  
  • Youth access to firearms  
  • Theft and illegal resale  
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households  
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
- n/a

+ Mr. Speaker, HB702 is a section 1 bill that creates a more standardized system of voluntary gun give-back programs for each local law enforcement agency. It gives guidance to local LEAs on which firearms to hold on to and for how long. It gives guidance on handling firearms that may be evidence in a crime. It gives guidance on how to either donate historically significant and antique firearms to museums or to auction them through a federally licensed firearms dealer. It also permits localities to recoup funds through auctions of historically significant and antique firearms.

  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ Mr. Speaker, I believe this is a piece of firearms legislation that both sides of the aisle, fingers crossed, can agree on.

  
- n/a

+ I hope it will be the will of the body to engross the bill and pass it on to its third reading.

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- <hr>

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ n/a

  
- === Support ===

+ <hr>

  
- • (to be updated)

+ == Support and Opposition ==

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ === Support ===

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === Opposition ===

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- • (to be updated)

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- === No Recommendation ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- <hr>

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ • (to be updated)

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ <hr>

  
- === Summary ===

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- <hr>

+ === Summary ===

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ <hr>

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ === TL;DR ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ <hr>

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ == Additional Information ==

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <br>

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <br>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <br>

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <br>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <br>

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <br>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <br>

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <br>

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  <mark>There is a substitute to this bill.</mark>
  
  This substitute includes language from the previous substitute you heard last time, which is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what <b>“destruction”</b> means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within <b>90 days</b> after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For <b>antique</b> or <b>historically significant firearms</b>, agencies have up to <b>180 days</b> to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, <b>may</b> be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers (FFLs) for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The substitute also creates a defined category for <b>"historically significant firearms"</b> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.
  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this substitute adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
  We've heard at least one complaint that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that the voluntary gun give-back process has predictable standards in all localities. This guidance serves to provide clarity for both agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.
  
  I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.
  
  <hr>
  
  <mark>1/22/2026
  
  <br>
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:
  
  <blockquote>
  (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 
  
  (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 
  
  (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and
  
  (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.
  </blockquote>
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ === Appropriations Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ Mr. Chairman, for HB702: we converted the original bill into a Section 1 substitute that removes the fiscal impact on the Commonwealth and eliminates the FIS.

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ It removes any mandates on the Virginia State Police.

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ The bill now requires local agencies design and run their own programs and report firearm return totals to the VSP. 

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ The bill allows the option to auction antique and historical firearms through federal firearms licensees, and any revenue gained from auctions may be used to offset program costs. 

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ 

- 

+ I hope it be the will of the subcommittee to report the bill to full committee.

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ 

- 

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

- ==== Conclusion ====

+ 

- 

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ 

- 

+ • Accidental shootings  

- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- <hr>

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- n/a

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- n/a

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
- === Support ===

+ n/a

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ n/a

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

- === Opposition ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ <hr>

  
- === No Recommendation ===

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Support ===

  
- <hr>

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ • Public safety advocates

- 

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- === Summary ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- <hr>

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ • (to be updated)

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ <hr>

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ === Summary ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ <hr>

  
- <br>

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ === TL;DR ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <hr>

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ == Additional Information ==

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <br>

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <br>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <br>

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <br>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <br>

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <br>

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ • Continuous improvement

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ 

+ • Complements intervention programs

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  <mark>There is a substitute to this bill.</mark>
  
  This substitute includes language from the previous substitute you heard last time, which is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
- First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.

+ First, it defines what <b>“destruction”</b> means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.

  
- Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.

+ Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within <b>90 days</b> after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For <b>antique</b> or <b>historically significant firearms</b>, agencies have up to <b>180 days</b> to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.

  
- Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, <b>may</b> be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.

+ Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, <b>may</b> be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers (FFLs) for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.

  
- The substitute also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.

+ The substitute also creates a defined category for <b>"historically significant firearms"</b> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.

  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
- The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.

+ The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this substitute adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.

  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
  We've heard at least one complaint that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that the voluntary gun give-back process has predictable standards in all localities. This guidance serves to provide clarity for both agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.
  
  I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.
  
  <hr>
  
  <mark>1/22/2026
  
  <br>
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:
  
  <blockquote>
  (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 
  
  (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 
  
  (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and
  
  (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.
  </blockquote>
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings  
  • Youth access to firearms  
  • Theft and illegal resale  
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households  
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  
  TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  <mark>There is a substitute to this bill.</mark>
  
  This substitute includes language from the previous substitute you heard last time, which is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, <b>may</b> be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The substitute also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.
  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
- We've heard at least one complaint that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

+ We've heard at least one complaint that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that the voluntary gun give-back process has predictable standards in all localities. This guidance serves to provide clarity for both agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
  I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.
  
  <hr>
  
  <mark>1/22/2026
  
  <br>
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:
  
  <blockquote>
  (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 
  
  (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 
  
  (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and
  
  (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.
  </blockquote>
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings  
  • Youth access to firearms  
  • Theft and illegal resale  
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households  
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  
  TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  <mark>There is a substitute to this bill.</mark>
  
  This substitute includes language from the previous substitute you heard last time, which is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, <b>may</b> be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The substitute also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.
  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
- We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

+ We've heard at least one complaint that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
  I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.
  
  <hr>
  
  <mark>1/22/2026
  
  <br>
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:
  
  <blockquote>
  (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 
  
  (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 
  
  (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and
  
  (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.
  </blockquote>
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings  
  • Youth access to firearms  
  • Theft and illegal resale  
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households  
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  
  TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
- <mark>There is an amendment to this bill. Counsel.</mark>

+ <mark>There is a substitute to this bill.</mark>

  
- This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.

+ This substitute includes language from the previous substitute you heard last time, which is making this a Section 1 bill.

  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
- Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.

+ Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, <b>may</b> be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.

  
- The amendment also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.

+ The substitute also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.

  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
  We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.
  
  I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.
  
  <hr>
  
  <mark>1/22/2026
  
  <br>
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:
  
  <blockquote>
  (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 
  
  (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 
  
  (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and
  
  (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.
  </blockquote>
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings  
  • Youth access to firearms  
  • Theft and illegal resale  
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households  
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  
  TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
- This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.

+ <mark>There is an amendment to this bill. Counsel.</mark>

  
- But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.

+ This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.

  
- First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.

+ But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.

  
- Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.

+ First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.

  
- Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.

+ Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.

  
- The amendment also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.

+ Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.

  
- It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.

+ The amendment also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.

  
- The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.

+ It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.

  
- <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>

+ The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.

  
- HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.

+ <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>

  
- We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

+ HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.

  
- I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

+ We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
- <hr>

+ I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

  
- <mark>1/22/2026

+ <hr>

  
- <br>

+ <mark>1/22/2026

  
- Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ <br>

  
- I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

+ I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

  
- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

  
- <blockquote>

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ 

- 

+ <blockquote>

- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

  
- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

  
- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

- </blockquote>

+ 

- 

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ </blockquote>

  
- Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

+ Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

  
- <hr>

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ <hr>

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ • Accidental shootings  

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- <hr>

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ <hr>

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- <hr>

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ <hr>

  
- === Support ===

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Support ===

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ • (to be updated)

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- === Opposition ===

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Opposition ===

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === No Recommendation ===

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- <hr>

+ • (to be updated)

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ <hr>

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- === Summary ===

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ === Summary ===

  
- <hr>

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ <hr>

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ === TL;DR ===

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

  
- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

  
- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <hr>

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

  
- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The amendment also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.
  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
- We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b>

+ We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
-  <i>I don't want 'ya guns;</i>I just want to make sure you have an easy way to release the ones you don't want. 

+ I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

  
- This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

+ <hr>

  
- I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

+ <mark>1/22/2026

  
- <hr>

+ <br>

  
- <mark>1/22/2026

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
- <br>

+ I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

  
- Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

  
- I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ <blockquote>

- 

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ 

- 

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

- <blockquote>

+ 

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

  
- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- 

+ </blockquote>

- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ 

- 

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ 

- </blockquote>

+ Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

  
- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

  
- Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

+ <hr>

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- <hr>

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ • Accidental shootings  

- 

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- 

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

- • Accidental shootings  

+ 

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ 

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ <hr>

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- <hr>

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ <hr>

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- <hr>

+ === Support ===

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- === Support ===

+ • Public safety advocates

- 

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ === Opposition ===

- • Public safety advocates

+ 

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

- === Opposition ===

+ 

- 

+ === No Recommendation ===

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ • (to be updated)

  
- === No Recommendation ===

+ <hr>

  
- • (to be updated)

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- <hr>

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ === Summary ===

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- === Summary ===

+ <hr>

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- <hr>

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ === TL;DR ===

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

- === TL;DR ===

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ <hr>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- <hr>

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]
- 

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- 

- [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The amendment also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.
  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
- We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> <i>I don't want 'ya guns;</i>I just want to make sure you have an easy way to release the ones you don't want. This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

+ We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b>

  
- I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

+  <i>I don't want 'ya guns;</i>I just want to make sure you have an easy way to release the ones you don't want. 

  
- <hr>

+ This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
- <mark>1/22/2026

+ I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

  
- <br>

+ <hr>

  
- Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ <mark>1/22/2026

  
- I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

+ <br>

  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

  
- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

  
- <blockquote>

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ 

- 

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ 

- 

+ <blockquote>

- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

  
- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

- </blockquote>

+ 

- 

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ 

- 

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

+ </blockquote>

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

  
- <hr>

+ Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ <hr>

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ 

- 

+ • Accidental shootings  

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- <hr>

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ <hr>

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- <hr>

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- n/a

+ <hr>

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- <hr>

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ n/a

  
- === Support ===

+ <hr>

  
- • (to be updated)

+ == Support and Opposition ==

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ === Support ===

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === Opposition ===

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- • (to be updated)

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- === No Recommendation ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- <hr>

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ • (to be updated)

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ <hr>

  
- === Summary ===

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- <hr>

+ === Summary ===

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ <hr>

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ === TL;DR ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ <hr>

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ == Additional Information ==

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <br>

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <br>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <br>

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <br>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <br>

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <br>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <br>

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <br>

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The amendment also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.
  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
- We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> I don't want your guns; <b>I just want to make sure you have an easy way to release the ones you don't want.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

+ We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> <i>I don't want 'ya guns;</i>I just want to make sure you have an easy way to release the ones you don't want. This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
  I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.
  
  <hr>
  
  <mark>1/22/2026
  
  <br>
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:
  
  <blockquote>
  (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 
  
  (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 
  
  (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and
  
  (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.
  </blockquote>
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings  
  • Youth access to firearms  
  • Theft and illegal resale  
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households  
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  
  TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The amendment also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.
  
  It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
- We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." It's not. It's giving parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

+ We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." I want to be crystal clear: <b>it's not.</b> I don't want your guns; <b>I just want to make sure you have an easy way to release the ones you don't want.</b> This bill simply gives parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
  I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.
  
  <hr>
  
  <mark>1/22/2026
  
  <br>
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:
  
  <blockquote>
  (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 
  
  (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 
  
  (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and
  
  (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.
  </blockquote>
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings  
  • Youth access to firearms  
  • Theft and illegal resale  
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households  
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  
  TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
- The amendment also creates a defined category for historically significant firearms and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill. It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.

+ The amendment also creates a defined category for <i>historically significant firearms</i> (40 years old or older and of some historical, collector, or cultural value) and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill.

  
- Taken together, the bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.

+ It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.

  
- <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>

+ The bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.

  
- HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.

+ <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>

  
- We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." It's not. It's giving parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

+ HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.

  
- I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

+ We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." It's not. It's giving parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
- <hr>

+ I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

  
- <mark>1/22/2026

+ <hr>

  
- <br>

+ <mark>1/22/2026

  
- Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ <br>

  
- I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

+ I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

  
- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

  
- <blockquote>

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ 

- 

+ <blockquote>

- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

  
- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

  
- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

- </blockquote>

+ 

- 

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ </blockquote>

  
- Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

+ Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

  
- <hr>

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ <hr>

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ • Accidental shootings  

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- <hr>

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ <hr>

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- <hr>

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ <hr>

  
- === Support ===

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Support ===

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ • (to be updated)

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- === Opposition ===

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Opposition ===

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === No Recommendation ===

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- <hr>

+ • (to be updated)

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ <hr>

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- === Summary ===

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ === Summary ===

  
- <hr>

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ <hr>

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ === TL;DR ===

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

  
- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

  
- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <hr>

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

  
- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.
  
  But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.
  
  First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.
  
  Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.
  
  Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.
  
  The amendment also creates a defined category for historically significant firearms and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill. It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.
  
  Taken together, the bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.
  
  <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>
  
  HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.
  
- I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

+ We've heard complaints that this is a "forced gun handover." It's not. It's giving parameters and direction to our  <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> so that they all provide predictable standards regarding voluntary gun give-back in all localities, both for agencies and those releasing unwanted firearms.

  
- <hr>

+ I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

  
- <mark>1/22/2026

+ <hr>

  
- <br>

+ <mark>1/22/2026

  
- Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ <br>

  
- I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

+ I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

  
- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

  
- <blockquote>

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ 

- 

+ <blockquote>

- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

  
- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

  
- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

- </blockquote>

+ 

- 

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ </blockquote>

  
- Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

+ Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

  
- <hr>

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ <hr>

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ • Accidental shootings  

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- <hr>

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ <hr>

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- <hr>

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ <hr>

  
- === Support ===

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Support ===

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ • (to be updated)

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- === Opposition ===

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Opposition ===

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === No Recommendation ===

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- <hr>

+ • (to be updated)

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ <hr>

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- === Summary ===

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ === Summary ===

  
- <hr>

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ <hr>

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ === TL;DR ===

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

  
- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

  
- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <hr>

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

  
- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
- Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ This amendment includes the amended language you heard last time, that is making this a Section 1 bill.

  
- I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

+ But in addition, we have added new language that does three main things: it clarifies disposal standards, creates a responsible preservation pathway, and adds clear timelines.

  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

+ First, it defines what “destruction” means. Under the amendment, destruction now means permanently rendering a firearm inoperable through approved mechanical methods, so there is no ambiguity about what proper disposal requires.

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ Second, it establishes timelines. Non-evidentiary firearms must be disposed of within 90 days after they are cleared, either through destruction or transfer to a federally licensed dealer. For antique or historically significant firearms, agencies have up to 180 days to place them with a museum or licensed dealer before destruction is permitted.

  
- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ Third, it creates structured alternatives to destruction. All antique firearms, whether operable or not, and certain older firearms with historical or collector value, may be donated to museums or transferred through licensed dealers for lawful sale or auction, subject to all state and federal requirements, including background checks.

  
- <blockquote>

+ The amendment also creates a defined category for historically significant firearms and explains how they are handled, which was not addressed in the original bill. It further requires that any proceeds from sales be restricted to program administration or the local general fund.

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ 

- 

+ Taken together, the bill still requires forensic testing, protects evidentiary needs, preserves confidentiality, and ensures that non-evidentiary firearms are removed from circulation. What this amendment adds is clarity, accountability, and responsible stewardship.

- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ 

- 

+ <mark>Speaking to the bill</mark>

- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ 

- 

+ HB702 remains focused on its core purpose: directing <i>local law enforcement agencies</i> to adopt a consistent, safe, and transparent system for removing unwanted firearms, surrendered <i>voluntarily</i>, from communities while ensuring that historically significant firearms are handled appropriately and lawfully.

- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ 

- </blockquote>

+ I hope it will be the pleasure of the body to report the bill favorably.

  
- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ <hr>

  
- Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

+ <mark>1/22/2026

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

+ <br>

  
- <hr>

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ <blockquote>

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

  
- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

  
- <hr>

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- 

+ </blockquote>

- ==== Conclusion ====

+ 

- 

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ 

- 

+ Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ 

- 

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ 

- 

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

- === House Committee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ • Accidental shootings  

- === Floor Statement ===

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- n/a

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- n/a

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- <hr>

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- === Support ===

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- • (to be updated)

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ <hr>

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === House Committee Statement ===

- === Opposition ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
- === No Recommendation ===

+ n/a

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ n/a

  
- === Summary ===

+ <hr>

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- <hr>

+ === Support ===

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ • Public safety advocates

- 

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- === TL;DR ===

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === No Recommendation ===

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ • (to be updated)

  
- <br>

+ <hr>

  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Summary ===

- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- <br>

+ <hr>

  
- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ == Possible Questions ==

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === TL;DR ===

- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <hr>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <br>

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <br>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <hr>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

  
- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ • Encourages participation

+ • Protects privacy

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ 

+ • Annual data collection

+ • Program evaluation

+ • Continuous improvement

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ 

+ • Complements intervention programs

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

+ I ask that the subcommittee adopt the substitute.

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

  
- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

  
- <blockquote>

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ 

- 

+ <blockquote>

- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

  
- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

  
- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

- </blockquote>

+ 

- 

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ </blockquote>

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

  
- <hr>

+ Fredericksburg City Council already sent a letter to the members of this subcommittee in support of this bill.

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to the full committee.

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ <hr>

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ 

- 

+ • Accidental shootings  

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- <hr>

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ <hr>

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- <hr>

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- n/a

+ <hr>

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- <hr>

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ n/a

  
- === Support ===

+ <hr>

  
- • (to be updated)

+ == Support and Opposition ==

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ === Support ===

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === Opposition ===

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- • (to be updated)

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- === No Recommendation ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- <hr>

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ • (to be updated)

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ <hr>

  
- === Summary ===

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- <hr>

+ === Summary ===

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ <hr>

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ === TL;DR ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ <hr>

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ == Additional Information ==

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <br>

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <br>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <br>

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <br>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <br>

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <br>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <br>

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <br>

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
- The substitute:

+ === Purpose of the Substitute ===

  
- • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  

+ To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.

- • Removes State Police operational control  

+ 

- • Makes local programs mandatory  

+ The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.

- • Establishes required minimum program elements  

+ 

- • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  

+ <hr>

- • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  

+ 

- • Protects participant confidentiality  

+ == Opening Statement ==

- • Requires annual reporting to State Police  

+ 

- 

+ === House Subcommittee Statement ===

- === Purpose of the Substitute ===

+ 

- 

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

- To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.

+ 

- 

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

- The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.

+ 

- 

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

- == Opening Statement ==

+ 

- 

+ <blockquote>

- === House Subcommittee Statement ===

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

  
- Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- 

+ </blockquote>

- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ 

- 

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

- <blockquote>

+ 

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

  
- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ <hr>

  
- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

- </blockquote>

+ 

- 

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ 

- 

+ • Accidental shootings  

- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- <hr>

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ <hr>

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ ==== Conclusion ====

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ 

- 

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ 

- 

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ 

- 

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- ==== Conclusion ====

+ 

- 

+ === House Committee Statement ===

- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ 

- 

+ === Floor Statement ===

- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- === House Committee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- === Floor Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ == Support and Opposition ==

- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ === Support ===

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- n/a

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

  
- <hr>

+ === Opposition ===

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

- === Support ===

+ 

- 

+ === No Recommendation ===

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ • (to be updated)

- • Public safety advocates

+ 

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ <hr>

  
- === Opposition ===

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- • (to be updated)

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === Summary ===

- === No Recommendation ===

+ 

- 

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Possible Questions ==

- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ 

- 

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ 

- 

+ === TL;DR ===

- === Summary ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

  
- <hr>

+ <br>

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- === TL;DR ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ == Additional Information ==

- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ 

- 

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ • Reduces theft risk

- 

+ • Improves storage compliance

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- == Additional Information ==

+ 

- 

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ • Clear expectations

- • Reduces theft risk

+ • Transparent reporting

- • Improves storage compliance

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Encourages participation

- • Uniform rules statewide

+ • Protects privacy

- • Clear expectations

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

- • Transparent reporting

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Annual data collection

- • Encourages participation

+ • Program evaluation

- • Protects privacy

+ • Continuous improvement

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Complements intervention programs

- • Annual data collection

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- • Program evaluation

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

- • Continuous improvement

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

- 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]
- <br>

- 

- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- 

- • Complements intervention programs

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

- 

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- 

- [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police operational control  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes required minimum program elements  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
- HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

- a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

+ 

- 

+ <blockquote>

- <blockquote>

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

- (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

+ 

- 

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

- (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

+ 

- 

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

- (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

+ 

- 

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ </blockquote>

- </blockquote>

+ 

- 

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ 

- 

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ 

- 

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ 

- 

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ 

- 

+ • Accidental shootings  

- • Accidental shootings  

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ 

- 

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ 

- 

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ ==== Conclusion ====

- ==== Conclusion ====

+ 

- 

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ 

- 

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ 

- 

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ 

- 

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ === House Committee Statement ===

- === House Committee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ === Floor Statement ===

- === Floor Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Support and Opposition ==

- == Support and Opposition ==

+ 

- 

+ === Support ===

- === Support ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ • Public safety advocates

- • Public safety advocates

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- === Opposition ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === No Recommendation ===

- === No Recommendation ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ 

- 

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ 

- 

+ === Summary ===

- === Summary ===

+ 

- 

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Possible Questions ==

- == Possible Questions ==

+ 

- 

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ 

- 

+ === TL;DR ===

- === TL;DR ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Additional Information ==

- == Additional Information ==

+ 

- 

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ • Reduces theft risk

- • Reduces theft risk

+ • Improves storage compliance

- • Improves storage compliance

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- • Uniform rules statewide

+ • Clear expectations

- • Clear expectations

+ • Transparent reporting

- • Transparent reporting

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Encourages participation

- • Encourages participation

+ • Protects privacy

- • Protects privacy

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Annual data collection

- • Annual data collection

+ • Program evaluation

- • Program evaluation

+ • Continuous improvement

- • Continuous improvement

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Complements intervention programs

- • Complements intervention programs

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

- 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]
- [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police operational control  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes required minimum program elements  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either
- a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

+ a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require:

  
- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ <blockquote>

- 

+ (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; 

- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ 

- 

+ (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; 

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and

- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ 

- 

+ (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ </blockquote>

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

  
- • Accidental shootings  

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ <hr>

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ 

- 

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ 

- 

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ 

- 

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ • Accidental shootings  

- ==== Conclusion ====

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ <hr>

  
- <hr>

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- n/a

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- n/a

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- === Support ===

+ n/a

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ n/a

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- === Opposition ===

+ 

- 

+ == Support and Opposition ==

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ === Support ===

  
- === No Recommendation ===

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- • (to be updated)

+ • Public safety advocates

- 

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- === Summary ===

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ • (to be updated)

  
  <hr>
  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ === Summary ===

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ == Possible Questions ==

- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

  
- <br>

+ === TL;DR ===

  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
  <br>
  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
  <br>
  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
  <br>
  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
  <br>
  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
  <br>
  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
  <br>
  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- <hr>

+ <br>

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ <hr>

  
- <br>

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- • Clear expectations

+ • Reduces theft risk

- • Transparent reporting

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

  
- • Encourages participation

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- • Protects privacy

+ • Clear expectations

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

  
- • Annual data collection

+ • Encourages participation

- • Program evaluation

+ • Protects privacy

- • Continuous improvement

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ • Annual data collection

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Program evaluation

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ 

+ • Complements intervention programs

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police operational control  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes required minimum program elements  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either
- a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall

+ a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall include requirements that require (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; (ii) that such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; (iii) that returned firearms not used in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms that have been received through the implemented program.

- include requirements that require (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a

+ 

- person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; (ii) that

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

- such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such

+ 

- firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; (iii) that returned firearms not used

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

- in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a

+ 

- firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement

+ <hr>

- agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms

+ 

- that have been received through the implemented program

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

  
- <hr>

+ • Accidental shootings  

- 

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- 

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ 

- 

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ 

- 

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

- • Accidental shootings  

+ 

- • Youth access to firearms  

+ <hr>

- • Theft and illegal resale  

+ 

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- <hr>

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ <hr>

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ n/a

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ === Support ===

  
- n/a

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- <hr>

+ • Public safety advocates

- 

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- == Support and Opposition ==

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- === Support ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ === No Recommendation ===

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === Opposition ===

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- === No Recommendation ===

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Summary ===

  
- <hr>

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ <hr>

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- === Summary ===

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ === TL;DR ===

  
- <hr>

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

- == Possible Questions ==

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- === TL;DR ===

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

  
- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ 

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <hr>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <hr>

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]
- 

- • Complements intervention programs

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

- 

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- 

- [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  <hr>
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police operational control  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes required minimum program elements  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
- HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back programs.

  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
- HB702 requires every local law-enforcement agency to offer a voluntary, confidential way for residents to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and secure destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

+ HB702 requires each local law-enforcement agency shall develop policies and procedures to implement either

- 

+ a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. Such policies shall

- The bill does four core things:

+ include requirements that require (i) that each local law-enforcement agency designate when and where a

- 

+ person may voluntarily return a firearm, which shall be subsequently subjected to forensic testing; (ii) that

- • It requires local programs with clear minimum standards by January 1, 2028.  

+ such firearm may be retained by the receiving law-enforcement agency to be used as evidence if such

- • It ensures public safety through forensic testing and evidence retention.  

+ firearm is determined to have been used in the commission of a crime; (iii) that returned firearms not used

- • It mandates secure destruction of non-evidentiary firearms.  

+ in the commission of a crime shall be destroyed; and (iv) that the identity of any person who surrenders a

- • And maintains and protects participant privacy.

+ firearm shall be kept confidential. Such policies and procedures shall also require local law-enforcement

- 

+ agencies to submit an annual report to the Department of State Police that includes the number of firearms

- It also requires annual reporting to promote transparency and accountability.

+ that have been received through the implemented program

  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings  
  • Youth access to firearms  
  • Theft and illegal resale  
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households  
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  
  TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  
  TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  
  TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
- == Proposed Substitute ==

+ <hr>

  
- === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===

+ == Proposed Substitute ==

  
- Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

+ === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===

  
- The substitute:

+ Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

  
- • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  

+ The substitute:

- • Removes State Police oversight  

+ 

- • Makes local programs mandatory  

+ • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  

- • Establishes uniform minimum standards  

+ • Removes State Police operational control  

- • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  

+ • Makes local programs mandatory  

- • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  

+ • Establishes required minimum program elements  

- • Protects participant confidentiality  

+ • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  

- • Requires annual reporting to State Police  

+ • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  

- 

+ • Protects participant confidentiality  

- === Purpose of the Substitute ===

+ • Requires annual reporting to State Police  

  
- To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational standards, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.

+ === Purpose of the Substitute ===

  
- The substitute prioritizes local implementation while ensuring statewide consistency in firearm handling, evidence preservation, and data reporting.

+ To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational requirements, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.

  
- <hr>

+ The substitute prioritizes local implementation while preserving statewide consistency in evidence handling and reporting.

  
- == Opening Statement ==

+ <hr>

  
- === House Subcommittee Statement ===

+ == Opening Statement ==

  
- Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ === House Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
- This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

+ HB702 establishes a consistent, statewide approach for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.

  
- HB702 requires every local law-enforcement agency to offer a voluntary, confidential way for residents to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and secure destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

  
- The bill does four core things:

+ HB702 requires every local law-enforcement agency to offer a voluntary, confidential way for residents to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and secure destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

  
- • It requires standardized local programs by January 1, 2028.

+ The bill does four core things:

- • It ensures public safety through forensic testing and evidence retention.

+ 

- • It mandates secure destruction of non-evidentiary firearms.

+ • It requires local programs with clear minimum standards by January 1, 2028.  

- • And maintains and protects participant privacy.

+ • It ensures public safety through forensic testing and evidence retention.  

- 

+ • It mandates secure destruction of non-evidentiary firearms.  

- It also requires annual reporting to promote transparency and accountability.

+ • And maintains and protects participant privacy.

  
- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

+ It also requires annual reporting to promote transparency and accountability.

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

  
- <hr>

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ <hr>

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

  
- • Accidental shootings

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- • Youth access to firearms

+ 

- • Theft and illegal resale

+ • Accidental shootings  

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households

+ • Youth access to firearms  

- 

+ • Theft and illegal resale  

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households  

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

  
- <hr>

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ <hr>

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- <hr>

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ n/a

  
- n/a

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ <hr>

  
- === Support ===

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Support ===

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ 

- • Public safety advocates

+ • (to be updated)

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- === Opposition ===

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === Opposition ===

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- === No Recommendation ===

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- • (to be updated)

+ === No Recommendation ===

  
- <hr>

+ • (to be updated)

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ <hr>

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- === Summary ===

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ === Summary ===

  
- <hr>

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ <hr>

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- === TL;DR ===

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

+ === TL;DR ===

- TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

  
- <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

  
- <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
- <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

+ <br>

- TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- <br>

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

  
- === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

  
- === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

  
- <br>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

  
- === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ <hr>

  
- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

  
- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

  
- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

  
- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- <br>

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

  
- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ <br>

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

  
- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police oversight  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes uniform minimum standards  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational standards, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while ensuring statewide consistency in firearm handling, evidence preservation, and data reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires every local law-enforcement agency to offer a voluntary, confidential way for residents to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and secure destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.
  
  The bill does four core things:
  
  • It requires standardized local programs by January 1, 2028.
  • It ensures public safety through forensic testing and evidence retention.
  • It mandates secure destruction of non-evidentiary firearms.
  • And maintains and protects participant privacy.
  
  It also requires annual reporting to promote transparency and accountability.
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings
  • Youth access to firearms
  • Theft and illegal resale
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders following adoption of the substitute.

  
  === TL;DR ===
  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?”</b>  

- TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is voluntary. The bill requires agencies to offer programs, not individuals to use them.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>

+ <b>Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?”</b>  

- TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.

+ TL;DR: To ensure every community has access to a safe disposal option, regardless of location.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>  

- TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.

+ TL;DR: To preserve evidence if a firearm is linked to a crime and protect investigations.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>

+ <b>Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?”</b>  

- TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.

+ TL;DR: No. It does not affect lawful ownership, sales, or possession.

  
  <br>
  
- <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>

+ <b>Q5: “Will this expose participants to scrutiny or liability?”</b>  

- TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ TL;DR: No. The bill requires confidentiality.

  
  <br>
  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===

+ <b>Q6: “Why was the state-run program replaced with a local model?”</b>  

- 

+ TL;DR: Local programs are more accessible and build on existing successful models.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ 

- 

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their firearms?” ===

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires every locality to offer a program.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

- === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is entirely voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community for those who choose to use it.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ === Q2: “Why make this mandatory for local agencies?” ===

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Each local law-enforcement agency must implement a program.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Agencies may choose between give-back and buy-back models.

- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures equal access statewide. Without it, programs exist only in some communities. This bill guarantees that every resident has a nearby option, while allowing local flexibility in how programs operate.

- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ 

- 

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing of surrendered firearms?” ===

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be examined.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

- === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence. It strengthens accountability and prevents accidental destruction of relevant evidence.

- <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.

+ 

- 

+ === Q4: “Does this create new gun restrictions?” ===

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill regulates firearm disposal.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not regulate ownership.

- === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 does not affect who may own, buy, sell, or possess firearms. It creates a voluntary disposal option, not a new restriction.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.

+ 

- 

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from identification or investigation?” ===

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

- == Additional Information ==

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> Privacy protections are central to participation.

- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The bill requires agencies to protect participant identity. That encourages participation and prevents fear of stigma or retaliation.

- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ 

- • Reduces theft risk

+ <br>

- • Improves storage compliance

+ 

- 

+ === Q6: “Why replace the state program with a local framework?” ===

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The substitute removes the centralized State Police program.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It expands access through local delivery.

- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Local programs are easier to access, more familiar to residents, and build on existing successful models like Fredericksburg’s. The substitute keeps statewide standards while improving convenience and participation.

- • Uniform rules statewide

+ 

- • Clear expectations

+ <hr>

- • Transparent reporting

+ 

- 

+ == Additional Information ==

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ 

- 

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ • Reduces theft risk

- 

+ • Improves storage compliance

- • Encourages participation

+ 

- • Protects privacy

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ 

- 

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ • Clear expectations

- 

+ • Transparent reporting

- • Annual data collection

+ 

- • Program evaluation

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

- • Continuous improvement

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

- 

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ • Encourages participation

- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ • Protects privacy

- 

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

- • Complements intervention programs

+ 

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

- 

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ 

+ • Annual data collection

+ • Program evaluation

+ • Continuous improvement

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ 

+ • Complements intervention programs

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police oversight  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes uniform minimum standards  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational standards, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while ensuring statewide consistency in firearm handling, evidence preservation, and data reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires every local law-enforcement agency to offer a voluntary, confidential way for residents to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and secure destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.
  
  The bill does four core things:
  
  • It requires standardized local programs by January 1, 2028.
  • It ensures public safety through forensic testing and evidence retention.
  • It mandates secure destruction of non-evidentiary firearms.
  • And maintains and protects participant privacy.
  
  It also requires annual reporting to promote transparency and accountability.
  
- This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide.

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide. Importantly, it will not have an FIS, so you don't need to send it <i>upstairs</i>.

  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings
  • Youth access to firearms
  • Theft and illegal resale
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>
  TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>
  TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>
  TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>
  TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>
  TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police oversight  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes uniform minimum standards  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational standards, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while ensuring statewide consistency in firearm handling, evidence preservation, and data reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires every local law-enforcement agency to offer a voluntary, confidential way for residents to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and secure destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.
  
  The bill does four core things:
  
  • It requires standardized local programs by January 1, 2028.
  • It ensures public safety through forensic testing and evidence retention.
  • It mandates secure destruction of non-evidentiary firearms.
- • And it protects participant privacy.

+ • And maintains and protects participant privacy.

  
  It also requires annual reporting to promote transparency and accountability.
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings
  • Youth access to firearms
  • Theft and illegal resale
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>
  TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>
  TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>
  TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>
  TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>
  TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police oversight  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes uniform minimum standards  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational standards, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while ensuring statewide consistency in firearm handling, evidence preservation, and data reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
- Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ Mister Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
  HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.
  
  This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.
  
  HB702 requires every local law-enforcement agency to offer a voluntary, confidential way for residents to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and secure destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.
  
  The bill does four core things:
  
  • It requires standardized local programs by January 1, 2028.
  • It ensures public safety through forensic testing and evidence retention.
  • It mandates secure destruction of non-evidentiary firearms.
  • And it protects participant privacy.
  
  It also requires annual reporting to promote transparency and accountability.
  
  This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings
  • Youth access to firearms
  • Theft and illegal resale
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>
  TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>
  TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>
  TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>
  TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>
  TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
  Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police oversight  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes uniform minimum standards  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational standards, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while ensuring statewide consistency in firearm handling, evidence preservation, and data reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.
  
- The bill requires every local law enforcement agency to create a voluntary, confidential process for individuals to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and safe destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

+ This bill is based in part on a successful model already operating in Fredericksburg, brought forward by Councilman Chuck Frye, where a local give-back program has helped safely remove unwanted firearms from circulation for years.

  
- Specifically, the bill does four things:

+ HB702 requires every local law-enforcement agency to offer a voluntary, confidential way for residents to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and secure destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

  
- <b>Creates standardized local programs:</b> Each agency must implement either a give-back or buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

+ The bill does four core things:

  
- <b>Ensures public safety and accountability:</b> Returned firearms are subject to forensic testing and may be retained as evidence if linked to a crime.

+ • It requires standardized local programs by January 1, 2028.

- 

+ • It ensures public safety through forensic testing and evidence retention.

- <b>Provides for secure disposal:</b> Firearms not connected to criminal activity must be destroyed.

+ • It mandates secure destruction of non-evidentiary firearms.

- 

+ • And it protects participant privacy.

- <b>Protects participant privacy:</b> The identity of individuals who surrender firearms is kept confidential.

+ 

- 

+ It also requires annual reporting to promote transparency and accountability.

- The bill also requires annual reporting to the Department of State Police to support transparency and program evaluation.

+ 

- 

+ This is a practical, proven public safety measure that builds on local success while expanding access statewide.

- HB702 is a public safety tool that reduces the number of unsecured, unwanted, or unsafe firearms in our communities while respecting voluntary participation and privacy.

+ 

- 

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ 

- 

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ 

- 

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ 

- 

+ • Accidental shootings

- • Accidental shootings

+ • Youth access to firearms

- • Youth access to firearms

+ • Theft and illegal resale

- • Theft and illegal resale

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households

+ 

- 

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ 

- 

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ ==== Conclusion ====

- ==== Conclusion ====

+ 

- 

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ 

- 

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ 

- 

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ 

- 

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ === House Committee Statement ===

- === House Committee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ === Floor Statement ===

- === Floor Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Support and Opposition ==

- == Support and Opposition ==

+ 

- 

+ === Support ===

- === Support ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ • Public safety advocates

- • Public safety advocates

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === Opposition ===

- === Opposition ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === No Recommendation ===

- === No Recommendation ===

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ 

- 

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ 

- 

+ === Summary ===

- === Summary ===

+ 

- 

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Possible Questions ==

- == Possible Questions ==

+ 

- 

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.

- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.

+ 

- 

+ === TL;DR ===

- === TL;DR ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>

- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.

- TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>

- <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>

+ TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.

- TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>

+ TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.

- TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>

- <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>

+ TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.

- TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>

- <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>

+ TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.

- TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===

- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===

- === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===

- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.

- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===

- === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.

- <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.

- <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===

- === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Additional Information ==

- == Additional Information ==

+ 

- 

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ • Reduces theft risk

- • Reduces theft risk

+ • Improves storage compliance

- • Improves storage compliance

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- • Uniform rules statewide

+ • Clear expectations

- • Clear expectations

+ • Transparent reporting

- • Transparent reporting

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Encourages participation

- • Encourages participation

+ • Protects privacy

- • Protects privacy

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Annual data collection

- • Annual data collection

+ • Program evaluation

- • Program evaluation

+ • Continuous improvement

- • Continuous improvement

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ 

- 

+ • Complements intervention programs

- • Complements intervention programs

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

- 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

- 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]
- [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Amendment in Full Committee ==
  
  == Proposed Substitute ==
  
  === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===
  
- Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

+ Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

  
  The substitute:
  
  • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  
  • Removes State Police oversight  
  • Makes local programs mandatory  
  • Establishes uniform minimum standards  
  • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  
  • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  
  • Protects participant confidentiality  
  • Requires annual reporting to State Police  
  
  === Purpose of the Substitute ===
  
  To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational standards, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.
  
  The substitute prioritizes local implementation while ensuring statewide consistency in firearm handling, evidence preservation, and data reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Opening Statement ==
  
  === House Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee—
  
  HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.
  
  The bill requires every local law enforcement agency to create a voluntary, confidential process for individuals to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and safe destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.
  
  Specifically, the bill does four things:
  
  <b>Creates standardized local programs:</b> Each agency must implement either a give-back or buy-back program by January 1, 2028.
  
  <b>Ensures public safety and accountability:</b> Returned firearms are subject to forensic testing and may be retained as evidence if linked to a crime.
  
  <b>Provides for secure disposal:</b> Firearms not connected to criminal activity must be destroyed.
  
  <b>Protects participant privacy:</b> The identity of individuals who surrender firearms is kept confidential.
  
  The bill also requires annual reporting to the Department of State Police to support transparency and program evaluation.
  
  HB702 is a public safety tool that reduces the number of unsecured, unwanted, or unsafe firearms in our communities while respecting voluntary participation and privacy.
  
  I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Rationale for the Bill ====
  
  Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.
  
  This creates unnecessary risks, including:
  
  • Accidental shootings
  • Youth access to firearms
  • Theft and illegal resale
  • Unsafe storage in unstable households
  
  By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.
  
  The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.
  
  <hr>
  
  ==== Conclusion ====
  
  HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.
  
  It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.
  
  By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.
  
  I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.
  
  <hr>
  
  === House Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Floor Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  === Senate Committee Statement ===
  
  n/a
  
  <hr>
  
  == Support and Opposition ==
  
  === Support ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Community violence prevention organizations
  • Public safety advocates
  • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)
  
  === Opposition ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)
  
  === No Recommendation ===
  
  • (to be updated)
  
  <hr>
  
  == Fiscal Impact ==
  
  There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.
  
  === Summary ===
  
  Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Possible Questions ==
  
  This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.
  
  === TL;DR ===
  
  <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>
  TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>
  TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>
  TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>
  TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>
  TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.
  
  <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.
  
  <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.
  
  <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.
  
  <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.
  
  <br>
  
  === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===
  
  <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.
  
  <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.
  
  <hr>
  
  == Additional Information ==
  
  <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>
  
  • Removes unwanted firearms from homes
  • Reduces theft risk
  • Improves storage compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>
  
  • Uniform rules statewide
  • Clear expectations
  • Transparent reporting
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>
  
  • Encourages participation
  • Protects privacy
  • Reduces fear of enforcement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>
  
  • Annual data collection
  • Program evaluation
  • Continuous improvement
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.
  
  <br>
  
  <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>
  
  • Complements intervention programs
  • Reduces unsecured weapons
  • Promotes voluntary compliance
  
  <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.
  
  [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
  [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]
  
  <hr>
  
  == Overview ==
  
  === Summary as Introduced ===
  
  Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 
  
  Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.
  
  <hr>
  
  === Patrons ===
  
  ==== House Patrons ====
  
  • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)
  
  ==== Senate Patrons ====
  
  • None
  
  <hr>
  
  == Language ==
  
  The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.
  
  <hr>
  
- == Opening Statement ==

+ == Amendment in Full Committee ==

  
- === House Subcommittee Statement ===

+ == Proposed Substitute ==

  
- Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ === Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute (1/21/2026) ===

  
- HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.

+ Replaces the original statewide Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program with a locally administered framework requiring each local law-enforcement agency to implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

  
- The bill requires every local law enforcement agency to create a voluntary, confidential process for individuals to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and safe destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

+ The substitute:

  
- Specifically, the bill does four things:

+ • Eliminates the state-administered program and fund  

- 

+ • Removes State Police oversight  

- <b>Creates standardized local programs:</b> Each agency must implement either a give-back or buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

+ • Makes local programs mandatory  

- 

+ • Establishes uniform minimum standards  

- <b>Ensures public safety and accountability:</b> Returned firearms are subject to forensic testing and may be retained as evidence if linked to a crime.

+ • Requires forensic testing of surrendered firearms  

- 

+ • Requires destruction of firearms not linked to crimes  

- <b>Provides for secure disposal:</b> Firearms not connected to criminal activity must be destroyed.

+ • Protects participant confidentiality  

- 

+ • Requires annual reporting to State Police  

- <b>Protects participant privacy:</b> The identity of individuals who surrender firearms is kept confidential.

+ 

- 

+ === Purpose of the Substitute ===

- The bill also requires annual reporting to the Department of State Police to support transparency and program evaluation.

+ 

- 

+ To shift the program from a voluntary, centralized state model to a mandatory, locally administered model with clear operational standards, accountability mechanisms, and privacy protections.

- HB702 is a public safety tool that reduces the number of unsecured, unwanted, or unsafe firearms in our communities while respecting voluntary participation and privacy.

+ 

- 

+ The substitute prioritizes local implementation while ensuring statewide consistency in firearm handling, evidence preservation, and data reporting.

- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Opening Statement ==

- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ 

- 

+ === House Subcommittee Statement ===

- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ 

- 

+ Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee—

- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ 

- 

+ HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.

- • Accidental shootings

+ 

- • Youth access to firearms

+ The bill requires every local law enforcement agency to create a voluntary, confidential process for individuals to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and safe destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

- • Theft and illegal resale

+ 

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households

+ Specifically, the bill does four things:

  
- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ <b>Creates standardized local programs:</b> Each agency must implement either a give-back or buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ <b>Ensures public safety and accountability:</b> Returned firearms are subject to forensic testing and may be retained as evidence if linked to a crime.

  
- <hr>

+ <b>Provides for secure disposal:</b> Firearms not connected to criminal activity must be destroyed.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ <b>Protects participant privacy:</b> The identity of individuals who surrender firearms is kept confidential.

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ The bill also requires annual reporting to the Department of State Police to support transparency and program evaluation.

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ HB702 is a public safety tool that reduces the number of unsecured, unwanted, or unsafe firearms in our communities while respecting voluntary participation and privacy.

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ <hr>

  
- <hr>

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

  
- n/a

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ • Accidental shootings

- 

+ • Youth access to firearms

- n/a

+ • Theft and illegal resale

- 

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households

- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- n/a

+ 

- 

+ ==== Conclusion ====

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

- == Support and Opposition ==

+ 

- 

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

- === Support ===

+ 

- 

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

- • Public safety advocates

+ 

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ <hr>

  
- === Opposition ===

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- • (to be updated)

+ n/a

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

- 

+ === Floor Statement ===

- === No Recommendation ===

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ 

- 

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ 

- 

+ n/a

- === Summary ===

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ 

- 

+ == Support and Opposition ==

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ === Support ===

- == Possible Questions ==

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- 

+ • Public safety advocates

- === TL;DR ===

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

  
- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>

+ === Opposition ===

- TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- <br>

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

  
- <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>

+ === No Recommendation ===

- TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.

+ 

- 

+ • (to be updated)

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>

+ 

- TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- <br>

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>

+ === Summary ===

- TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.

+ 

- 

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>

+ 

- TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- <br>

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.

  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===

+ === TL;DR ===

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>

- 

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.

- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>

- <br>

+ TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.

  
- === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>

- 

+ TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.

- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>

- <br>

+ TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===

+ <br>

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.

+ <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>

- 

+ TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.

- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.

+ 

- 

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.

- === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

- <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.

- <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.

+ 

- 

+ === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.

- === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.

- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.

- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===

- == Additional Information ==

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.

- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ 

- • Reduces theft risk

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.

- • Improves storage compliance

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ 

- 

+ === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.

- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.

- • Uniform rules statewide

+ 

- • Clear expectations

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.

- • Transparent reporting

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ 

- 

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ 

- 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.

- • Encourages participation

+ 

- • Protects privacy

+ <hr>

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ 

- 

+ == Additional Information ==

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ 

- 

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ • Reduces theft risk

- 

+ • Improves storage compliance

- • Annual data collection

+ 

- • Program evaluation

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

- • Continuous improvement

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

- 

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ • Clear expectations

- 

+ • Transparent reporting

- • Complements intervention programs

+ 

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

- 

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ 

+ • Encourages participation

+ • Protects privacy

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ 

+ • Annual data collection

+ • Program evaluation

+ • Continuous improvement

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ 

+ • Complements intervention programs

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

  = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =
  
  == Status ==
  
- [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188

+ [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188 Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]

-  Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ == Overview ==

- == Overview ==

+ 

- 

+ === Summary as Introduced ===

- === Summary as Introduced ===

+ 

- 

+ Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 

- Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 

+ 

- 

+ Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.

- 26105848D

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.

+ 

- 

+ === Patrons ===

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ ==== House Patrons ====

- === Patrons ===

+ 

- 

+ • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)

- ==== House Patrons ====

+ 

- 

+ ==== Senate Patrons ====

- • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)

+ 

- 

+ • None

- ==== Senate Patrons ====

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- • None

+ 

- 

+ == Language ==

- <hr>

+ 

- 

+ The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702 HB702] can be viewed here.

- == Language ==

+ 

- 

+ <hr>

- The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702

+ 

-  HB702] can be viewed here.

+ == Opening Statement ==

  
- <hr>

+ === House Subcommittee Statement ===

  
- == Opening Statement ==

+ Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee—

  
- === House Subcommittee Statement ===

+ HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.

  
- Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ The bill requires every local law enforcement agency to create a voluntary, confidential process for individuals to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and safe destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

  
- HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.

+ Specifically, the bill does four things:

  
- The bill requires every local law-enforcement agency to create a voluntary, confidential process for individuals to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and safe destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

+ <b>Creates standardized local programs:</b> Each agency must implement either a give-back or buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

  
- Specifically, the bill does four things:

+ <b>Ensures public safety and accountability:</b> Returned firearms are subject to forensic testing and may be retained as evidence if linked to a crime.

  
- <b>Creates standardized local programs:</b> Each agency must implement either a give-back or buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

+ <b>Provides for secure disposal:</b> Firearms not connected to criminal activity must be destroyed.

  
- <b>Ensures public safety and accountability:</b> Returned firearms are subject to forensic testing and may be retained as evidence if linked to a crime.

+ <b>Protects participant privacy:</b> The identity of individuals who surrender firearms is kept confidential.

  
- <b>Provides for secure disposal:</b> Firearms not connected to criminal activity must be destroyed.

+ The bill also requires annual reporting to the Department of State Police to support transparency and program evaluation.

  
- <b>Protects participant privacy:</b> The identity of individuals who surrender firearms is kept confidential.

+ HB702 is a public safety tool that reduces the number of unsecured, unwanted, or unsafe firearms in our communities while respecting voluntary participation and privacy.

  
- The bill also requires annual reporting to the Department of State Police to support transparency and program evaluation.

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

  
- HB702 is a public safety tool that reduces the number of unsecured, unwanted, or unsafe firearms in our communities while respecting voluntary participation and privacy.

+ <hr>

  
- I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

  
- <hr>

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

  
- ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

  
- Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ • Accidental shootings

- 

+ • Youth access to firearms

- This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ • Theft and illegal resale

- 

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households

- • Accidental shootings

+ 

- • Youth access to firearms

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

- • Theft and illegal resale

+ 

- • Unsafe storage in unstable households

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

  
- By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ <hr>

  
- The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ ==== Conclusion ====

  
- <hr>

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

  
- ==== Conclusion ====

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

  
- HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

  
- It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

  
- By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ <hr>

  
- I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ === House Committee Statement ===

  
- <hr>

+ n/a

  
- === House Committee Statement ===

+ === Floor Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Floor Statement ===

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

  
  n/a
  
- === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ <hr>

  
- n/a

+ == Support and Opposition ==

  
- <hr>

+ === Support ===

  
- == Support and Opposition ==

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

- === Support ===

+ • Public safety advocates

- 

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Community violence prevention organizations

+ === Opposition ===

- • Public safety advocates

+ 

- • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ • (to be updated)

- 

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

- === Opposition ===

+ 

- 

+ === No Recommendation ===

- • (to be updated)

+ 

- • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ • (to be updated)

  
- === No Recommendation ===

+ <hr>

  
- • (to be updated)

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

  
- <hr>

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

  
- == Fiscal Impact ==

+ === Summary ===

  
- There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

  
- === Summary ===

+ <hr>

  
- Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ == Possible Questions ==

  
- <hr>

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.

  
- == Possible Questions ==

+ === TL;DR ===

  
- This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>

- 

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.

- === TL;DR ===

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>

+ 

- TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.

+ <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>

- 

+ TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>

+ 

- TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>

- 

+ TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>

+ 

- TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.

+ <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>

- 

+ TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>

+ 

- TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.

+ <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>

- 

+ TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.

- <br>

+ 

- 

+ <br>

- <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>

+ 

- TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.

  
- === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.

  
- <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.

+ === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.

  
- === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.

  
- <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.

  
- === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.

  
- <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.

+ === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.

  
- === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===

+ <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.

  
- <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.

+ <br>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===

  
- <br>

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

  
- === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.

  
- <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ <hr>

  
- <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.

+ == Additional Information ==

  
- <hr>

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

  
- == Additional Information ==

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

- 

+ • Reduces theft risk

- <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ • Improves storage compliance

  
- • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

- • Reduces theft risk

+ 

- • Improves storage compliance

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Uniform rules statewide

- 

+ • Clear expectations

- <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ • Transparent reporting

  
- • Uniform rules statewide

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

- • Clear expectations

+ 

- • Transparent reporting

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Encourages participation

- 

+ • Protects privacy

- <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

  
- • Encourages participation

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

- • Protects privacy

+ 

- • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Annual data collection

- 

+ • Program evaluation

- <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ • Continuous improvement

  
- • Annual data collection

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

- • Program evaluation

+ 

- • Continuous improvement

+ <br>

  
- <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

  
- <br>

+ • Complements intervention programs

- 

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

- <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

  
- • Complements intervention programs

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ 

- • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]
- 

- <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

- 

- [[Category:2026 Session]]

- = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program and Fund established. =

+ = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back and Buy-Back Programs =

  
- Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''.

+ == Status ==

  
- [[Category:2026 Session]]
+ [https://house.vga.virginia.gov/subcommittees/H15001/agendas/5188

+  Public Safety | Subcommittee — 1/22/2026]

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ == Overview ==

+ 

+ === Summary as Introduced ===

+ 

+ Firearms; local give-back and buy-back programs. HB702 directs each local law-enforcement agency to develop and implement either a firearm give-back program or a firearm buy-back program by January 1, 2028. The bill requires agencies to establish procedures for voluntary firearm surrender, forensic testing, destruction of non-evidentiary firearms, confidentiality protections, and annual reporting to the Department of State Police. 

+ 

+ 26105848D

+ 

+ Participation by local agencies is mandatory, but agencies may choose between a give-back model or a compensated buy-back model.

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ === Patrons ===

+ 

+ ==== House Patrons ====

+ 

+ • Joshua G. Cole (chief patron)

+ 

+ ==== Senate Patrons ====

+ 

+ • None

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ == Language ==

+ 

+ The language of [https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/HB702/text/HB702

+  HB702] can be viewed here.

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ == Opening Statement ==

+ 

+ === House Subcommittee Statement ===

+ 

+ Madam Chair, members of the subcommittee—

+ 

+ HB702 establishes a uniform, statewide framework for local firearm give-back and buy-back programs.

+ 

+ The bill requires every local law-enforcement agency to create a voluntary, confidential process for individuals to surrender firearms, with appropriate forensic review and safe destruction when those firearms are not linked to criminal activity.

+ 

+ Specifically, the bill does four things:

+ 

+ <b>Creates standardized local programs:</b> Each agency must implement either a give-back or buy-back program by January 1, 2028.

+ 

+ <b>Ensures public safety and accountability:</b> Returned firearms are subject to forensic testing and may be retained as evidence if linked to a crime.

+ 

+ <b>Provides for secure disposal:</b> Firearms not connected to criminal activity must be destroyed.

+ 

+ <b>Protects participant privacy:</b> The identity of individuals who surrender firearms is kept confidential.

+ 

+ The bill also requires annual reporting to the Department of State Police to support transparency and program evaluation.

+ 

+ HB702 is a public safety tool that reduces the number of unsecured, unwanted, or unsafe firearms in our communities while respecting voluntary participation and privacy.

+ 

+ I respectfully ask that the subcommittee favorably report HB702 to full committee.

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ ==== Rationale for the Bill ====

+ 

+ Unwanted, unsecured, or inherited firearms often remain in homes because residents lack safe, accessible disposal options.

+ 

+ This creates unnecessary risks, including:

+ 

+ • Accidental shootings

+ • Youth access to firearms

+ • Theft and illegal resale

+ • Unsafe storage in unstable households

+ 

+ By requiring every locality to offer a standardized surrender option, HB702 creates a predictable, trusted pathway for residents to remove firearms from circulation.

+ 

+ The bill also ensures that surrendered weapons are handled responsibly through forensic screening and evidence retention when necessary.

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ ==== Conclusion ====

+ 

+ HB702 is a measured, practical public safety initiative.

+ 

+ It does not mandate firearm ownership changes, restrict lawful possession, or require participation. Instead, it provides every community with a reliable, confidential option for voluntary firearm disposal.

+ 

+ By pairing local flexibility with statewide standards, the bill promotes safety, accountability, and transparency.

+ 

+ I respectfully ask for the committee’s support and favorable reporting.

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ === House Committee Statement ===

+ 

+ n/a

+ 

+ === Floor Statement ===

+ 

+ n/a

+ 

+ === Senate Subcommittee Statement ===

+ 

+ n/a

+ 

+ === Senate Committee Statement ===

+ 

+ n/a

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ == Support and Opposition ==

+ 

+ === Support ===

+ 

+ • (to be updated)

+ • Community violence prevention organizations

+ • Public safety advocates

+ • Local law enforcement associations (anticipated)

+ 

+ === Opposition ===

+ 

+ • (to be updated)

+ • Some firearm advocacy organizations (anticipated)

+ 

+ === No Recommendation ===

+ 

+ • (to be updated)

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ == Fiscal Impact ==

+ 

+ There is no fiscal impact statement for HB702.

+ 

+ === Summary ===

+ 

+ Implementation costs are expected to be absorbed at the local level and may vary based on program design, frequency of events, and staffing needs. Participation in buy-back programs may involve local funding or private partnerships.

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ == Possible Questions ==

+ 

+ This section addresses likely questions raised by members or stakeholders.

+ 

+ === TL;DR ===

+ 

+ <b>Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?”</b>

+ TL;DR: No. Participation is entirely voluntary.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>Q2: “Is this a gun control bill?”</b>

+ TL;DR: No. It creates a disposal option, not new ownership restrictions.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>Q3: “Why require forensic testing?”</b>

+ TL;DR: To ensure firearms linked to crimes are preserved as evidence.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>Q4: “Why mandate programs in every locality?”</b>

+ TL;DR: To ensure equal access to safe disposal statewide.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>Q5: “Are participants protected from identification?”</b>

+ TL;DR: Yes. The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ === Q1: “Does this require people to turn in their guns?” ===

+ 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires agencies to offer programs.

+ 

+ <b>What’s misleading:</b> It does not require any individual to participate.

+ 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> HB702 is voluntary for residents. It simply ensures that a safe, confidential option exists in every community.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ === Q2: “Is this a form of gun control?” ===

+ 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill addresses firearm disposal.

+ 

+ <b>What’s often omitted:</b> It does not regulate ownership, sales, or possession.

+ 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> This is a public safety and waste-management policy, not a restriction on lawful gun ownership.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ === Q3: “Why require forensic testing?” ===

+ 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> All surrendered firearms must be tested.

+ 

+ <b>What’s incomplete:</b> Testing protects criminal investigations.

+ 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Forensic screening ensures that evidence is preserved when a firearm is linked to a crime, strengthening accountability.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ === Q4: “Why make programs mandatory for agencies?” ===

+ 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> Every locality must implement a program.

+ 

+ <b>What’s omitted:</b> Agencies may choose the model.

+ 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> The mandate ensures statewide access, while allowing local flexibility in program design.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ === Q5: “Are participants protected from scrutiny?” ===

+ 

+ <b>What’s true:</b> The bill requires confidentiality.

+ 

+ <b>Answer you can use:</b> Identity protections encourage participation and prevent fear of retaliation or stigma.

+ 

+ <hr>

+ 

+ == Additional Information ==

+ 

+ <b>1. Voluntary firearm disposal reduces accidental and unauthorized use</b>

+ 

+ • Removes unwanted firearms from homes

+ • Reduces theft risk

+ • Improves storage compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Prevention-oriented safety policy.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>2. Standardization improves trust and participation</b>

+ 

+ • Uniform rules statewide

+ • Clear expectations

+ • Transparent reporting

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Predictability increases public engagement.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>3. Confidentiality is central to effectiveness</b>

+ 

+ • Encourages participation

+ • Protects privacy

+ • Reduces fear of enforcement

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Privacy protections are essential to program success.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>4. Reporting supports evidence-based policy</b>

+ 

+ • Annual data collection

+ • Program evaluation

+ • Continuous improvement

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Enables future refinement based on results.

+ 

+ <br>

+ 

+ <b>5. The bill supports community-based violence prevention</b>

+ 

+ • Complements intervention programs

+ • Reduces unsecured weapons

+ • Promotes voluntary compliance

+ 

+ <b>Policy implication:</b> Integrates public safety with prevention strategies.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

- == HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program and Fund established ==
+ = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program and Fund established. =

- 
+ 

- Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''.
+ Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]

- == HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program and Fund established ==
+ = HB702 Virginia Firearm Give-Back Program and Fund established. =

- 
+ 

- Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''.
+ Start writing your article here using '''Wikitext'''.

+ 

+ [[Category:2026 Session]]